DURA vs. QUS

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) and QUS (State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DURA tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DURA returned 7.56%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for QUS. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DURA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.

Performance

DURA vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 11.79% return.

DURA

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 2.76%
• 6M: 5.17%
• YTD: 15.86%
• 1Y: 20.94%
• 3Y*: 10.48%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.21%

QUS

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.61%
• 6M: 9.40%
• YTD: 11.79%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: 17.66%
• 5Y*: 11.08%
• 10Y*: 13.70%
• ALL TIME*: 12.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	$118.41K	$102.33K	$74.84K
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF	$3.07M	$4.72M	$3.42M

DURA vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	15.86%	7.61%	8.51%	0.82%	2.41%	15.53%	0.04%	27.55%	-3.77%
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF	11.79%	14.13%	18.99%	21.78%	-14.15%	26.72%	12.40%	32.45%	-5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DURA and QUS is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between DURA and QUS has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DURA vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DURA	QUS
Consumer Defensive	22.3%	8.3%
Healthcare	15.4%	14.4%
Energy	14.5%	3.3%
Financial Services	9.9%	15.7%
Technology	8.9%	28.4%
Communication Services	8.4%	8.2%
Utilities	6.9%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	5.7%
Industrials	5.6%	8.1%
Basic Materials	2.0%	2.2%
Real Estate	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

DURA vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DURA

DURA Risk / Return Rank: 61
DURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
DURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DURA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
DURA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QUS

QUS Risk / Return Rank: 84
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DURA vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DURA	QUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.27	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.20	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.41	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	3.04	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.78	13.56	-3.79

DURA vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DURA Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DURA and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DURA vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, roughly equal to the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and QUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DURA	QUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.15%	-33.78%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.53%	-6.85%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	-13.94%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.80%	-22.30%	+6.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	0.00%	-1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.87%	-3.66%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	1.53%	+0.62%

Volatility

DURA vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.76%. This indicates that DURA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DURA	QUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	2.76%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.93%	7.06%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.74%	9.21%	+5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.67%	14.33%	-0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	16.40%	+0.48%

DURA vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

DURA vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than QUS's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	3.14%	3.59%	3.33%	3.58%	3.01%	2.89%	3.49%	3.83%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF	1.25%	1.38%	1.49%	1.57%	1.68%	1.27%	1.73%	1.81%	2.12%	1.86%	2.07%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DURA and QUS in my portfolio?

DURA and QUS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DURA or QUS?

DURA has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to QUS (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURA dropped -33.15% vs QUS's -33.78%.

Which ETF is better, DURA or QUS?

On 5-year performance, QUS leads with 11.08% vs 7.56% for DURA. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DURA or QUS?

Over the 5-year period, QUS has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DURA or QUS?

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for DURA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DURA or QUS?

DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 1.25% for QUS.

What is the main difference between DURA and QUS?

DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DURA and 0.15% for QUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.