DURA vs. FTAG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) and FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DURA tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index while FTAG tracks the Indxx Global Agriculture Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DURA returned 7.63%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FTAG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DURA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FTAG.

Performance

DURA vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly higher than FTAG's 6.79% return.

DURA

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -2.77%
• YTD: 12.23%
• 6M: 12.16%
• 1Y: 20.37%
• 3Y*: 10.25%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: —

FTAG

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 6.97%
• 1Y: 8.43%
• 3Y*: 3.75%
• 5Y*: 0.85%
• 10Y*: 5.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DURA vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	12.23%	7.61%	8.51%	0.82%	2.41%	15.53%	0.04%	27.55%	-3.77%
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	6.79%	14.82%	-6.72%	-7.28%	-4.52%	17.31%	13.88%	9.05%	-1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DURA and FTAG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018	0.52

The correlation between DURA and FTAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

DURA vs. FTAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DURA	FTAG
Consumer Defensive	22.1%	8.5%
Healthcare	14.3%	7.7%
Energy	13.8%	-
Technology	11.2%	-
Financial Services	9.0%	-
Communication Services	8.8%	-
Utilities	6.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	4.2%
Industrials	6.0%	24.0%
Basic Materials	1.9%	55.6%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

DURA vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DURA

DURA Risk / Return Rank: 50
DURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
DURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DURA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
DURA Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FTAG

FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 19
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DURA vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DURA	FTAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	0.60	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	0.95	+1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.11	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	0.89	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.72	2.04	+7.68

DURA vs. FTAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DURA Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the FTAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DURA and FTAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DURA vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and FTAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DURA	FTAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.15%	-90.89%	+57.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.53%	-9.56%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	-21.87%	+7.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.80%	-32.77%	+16.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.77%	-79.35%	+76.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-71.25%	+67.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	4.15%	-2.05%

Volatility

DURA vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) is 3.22%, while First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that DURA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DURA	FTAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.22%	3.95%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.78%	10.93%	-3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.79%	14.17%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.61%	17.41%	-3.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	19.60%	-2.65%

DURA vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

DURA vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison

DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than FTAG's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	3.31%	3.59%	3.33%	3.58%	3.01%	2.89%	3.49%	3.83%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	1.42%	1.39%	2.89%	3.68%	1.77%	1.58%	1.72%	2.33%	2.16%	1.26%	0.61%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DURA and FTAG in my portfolio?

DURA and FTAG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DURA or FTAG?

FTAG has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to DURA (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURA dropped -33.15% vs FTAG's -90.89%.

Which ETF is better, DURA or FTAG?

On 5-year performance, DURA leads with 7.63% vs 0.85% for FTAG. On fees, DURA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DURA has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DURA or FTAG?

Over the 5-year period, DURA has performed better with a 7.63% return vs 0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DURA or FTAG?

DURA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DURA or FTAG?

DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.42% for FTAG.

What is the main difference between DURA and FTAG?

DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index, while FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DURA and 0.70% for FTAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DURA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.