DURA vs. DIVS
DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) and DIVS (SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DURA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index, while DIVS is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. DURA is passively managed, while DIVS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DURA returned 7.29%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for DIVS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DURA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVS.
Performance
DURA vs. DIVS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly higher than DIVS's 6.44% return.
DURA
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 21.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
DURA vs. DIVS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 12.48% | 7.61% | 8.51% | 0.82% | 2.41% | 8.46% |
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF | 6.44% | 11.66% | 12.60% | 15.98% | -8.97% | 17.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DURA and DIVS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between DURA and DIVS shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DURA vs. DIVS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DURA
DIVS
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
DURA
DIVS
Energy
DURA
DIVS
-
Healthcare
DURA
DIVS
Financial Services
DURA
DIVS
Technology
DURA
DIVS
Communication Services
DURA
DIVS
Utilities
DURA
DIVS
-
Consumer Cyclical
DURA
DIVS
Industrials
DURA
DIVS
Basic Materials
DURA
DIVS
-
Real Estate
DURA
-
DIVS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DURA vs. DIVS — Risk / Return Rank
DURA
DIVS
DURA vs. DIVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DURA | DIVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 1.01 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 1.50 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 1.00 | +1.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 3.56 | +7.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DURA | DIVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.01 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.70 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.39 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
DURA vs. DIVS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, which is greater than DIVS's maximum drawdown of -29.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and DIVS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DURA | DIVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -29.55% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | -10.62% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -12.61% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.80% | -20.71% | +4.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -1.63% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -3.72% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 2.96% | -0.94% |
Volatility
DURA vs. DIVS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) at 2.95%. This indicates that DURA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DURA | DIVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 2.95% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 8.21% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 10.46% | +4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 13.05% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 26.22% | -9.23% |
DURA vs. DIVS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVS's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DURA vs. DIVS - Dividend Comparison
DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than DIVS's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF | 2.62% | 2.61% | 2.66% | 3.14% | 5.93% | 3.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.30% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.83% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DURA and DIVS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DURA has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to DIVS (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURA dropped -33.15% vs DIVS's -29.55%.
On 5-year performance, DIVS leads with 9.05% vs 7.29% for DURA. On fees, DURA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DIVS has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVS has performed better with a 9.05% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DURA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVS.
DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.62% for DIVS.
DURA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DIVS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DURA and 0.65% for DIVS.
DURA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DURA and DIVS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer