DIVS vs. PICK
DIVS (SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF) and PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVS is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management, while PICK is a Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. DIVS is actively managed, while PICK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVS returned 9.00%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for PICK. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PICK.
Performance
DIVS vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVS achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 17.36% return.
DIVS
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 10.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- —
PICK
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 17.36%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- 1Y
- 69.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 16.67%
DIVS vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF | 6.02% | 11.66% | 12.60% | 15.98% | -8.97% | 17.30% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 17.36% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 7.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVS and PICK is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between DIVS and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIVS vs. PICK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVS
PICK
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
DIVS
PICK
Technology
DIVS
PICK
Consumer Defensive
DIVS
PICK
Financial Services
DIVS
PICK
Healthcare
DIVS
PICK
-
Communication Services
DIVS
PICK
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIVS
PICK
-
Basic Materials
DIVS
-
PICK
Energy
DIVS
-
PICK
Real Estate
DIVS
-
PICK
-
Utilities
DIVS
-
PICK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVS vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
DIVS
PICK
DIVS vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVS | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 3.56 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | 13.38 | -9.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVS vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVS drawdown since its inception was -29.55%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVS and PICK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVS | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.55% | -68.87% | +39.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -19.54% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -32.52% | +19.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.71% | -36.37% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -12.59% | +10.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -24.06% | +20.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 5.20% | -2.23% |
Volatility
DIVS vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) is 2.91%, while iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 13.12%. This indicates that DIVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVS | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 13.12% | -10.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.42% | 26.56% | -18.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.60% | 30.14% | -19.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 28.14% | -15.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 28.34% | -2.24% |
DIVS vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVS vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
DIVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than PICK's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF | 3.17% | 2.61% | 2.66% | 3.14% | 5.93% | 3.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.21% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVS and PICK have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PICK has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to DIVS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVS dropped -29.55% vs PICK's -68.87%.
On 5-year performance, PICK leads with 10.54% vs 9.00% for DIVS. On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DIVS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PICK has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVS.
DIVS has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 2.21% for PICK.
DIVS is categorized as Global Equities, while PICK is Metals. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVS and 0.39% for PICK.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVS and PICK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer