DURA vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
DURA and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DURA is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2018. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Performance
DURA vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DURA vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 10.74% | 7.61% | 8.51% | 3.56% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | -1.41% | 10.61% | 19.07% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's -1.41% return.
DURA
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 13.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DURA vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DURA vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
DURA
BDGS
DURA vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DURA | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 0.99 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.67 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.80 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.18 | 9.34 | -5.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DURA | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.99 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.51 | -0.98 |
Correlation
The correlation between DURA and BDGS is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DURA vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.25% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.83% | 0.66% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DURA vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and BDGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DURA | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -9.12% | -24.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -5.85% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -2.15% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -0.67% | -3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 1.13% | +2.47% |
Volatility
DURA vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) is 2.76%, while Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that DURA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DURA | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 3.39% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 5.09% | +7.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 10.70% | +7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.55% | 8.35% | +5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 8.35% | +8.74% |