DURA vs. BBUS
DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DURA tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DURA returned 7.63%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for BBUS. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DURA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
DURA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURA achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.57% return.
DURA
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 12.23%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 6.62%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- —
DURA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 12.23% | 7.61% | 8.51% | 0.82% | 2.41% | 15.53% | 0.04% | 15.90% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 7.57% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DURA and BBUS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DURA and BBUS has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DURA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DURA
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
DURA
BBUS
Healthcare
DURA
BBUS
Energy
DURA
BBUS
Technology
DURA
BBUS
Financial Services
DURA
BBUS
Communication Services
DURA
BBUS
Utilities
DURA
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
DURA
BBUS
Industrials
DURA
BBUS
Basic Materials
DURA
BBUS
Real Estate
DURA
-
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DURA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
DURA
BBUS
DURA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DURA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 2.49 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 10.97 | -1.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DURA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURA drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURA and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DURA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -35.35% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.53% | -9.21% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -19.01% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.80% | -25.46% | +9.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -3.47% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -5.43% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.08% | +0.02% |
Volatility
DURA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) is 3.22%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that DURA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DURA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 5.00% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 9.95% | -2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 12.59% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 17.14% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 19.59% | -2.64% |
DURA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
DURA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
DURA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than BBUS's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% |
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.31% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.83% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DURA and BBUS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBUS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to DURA (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURA dropped -33.15% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.52% vs 7.63% for DURA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, DURA has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for DURA.
DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.01% for BBUS.
DURA tracks Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DURA and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DURA and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer