DUOT vs. ALLT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) and Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT).

Performance

DUOT vs. ALLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) and Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DUOT vs. ALLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DUOT Duos Technologies Group, Inc.	-42.22%	88.13%	106.21%	45.00%	-61.01%	20.99%	-36.64%	-4.40%	-7.41%	1,324.80%
ALLT Allot Communications Ltd	-29.60%	65.21%	260.61%	-52.03%	-71.04%	12.93%	23.76%	40.03%	13.88%	11.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap DUOT : $63.15M ALLT : $344.99M
EPS DUOT : -$0.85 ALLT : $0.08
PS Ratio DUOT : 2.57 ALLT : 3.01
PB Ratio DUOT : 1.30 ALLT : 3.04
Total Revenue (TTM) DUOT : $28.16M ALLT : $101.99M
Gross Profit (TTM) DUOT : $7.91M ALLT : $71.72M
EBITDA (TTM) DUOT : -$7.00M ALLT : $8.49M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUOT achieves a -42.22% return, which is significantly lower than ALLT's -29.60% return. Over the past 10 years, DUOT has outperformed ALLT with an annualized return of 6.82%, while ALLT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.08% annualized return.

DUOT

• 1D: -5.25%
• 1M: -14.59%
• YTD: -42.22%
• 6M: -11.44%
• 1Y: 24.52%
• 3Y*: 32.41%
• 5Y*: -9.49%
• 10Y*: 6.82%

ALLT

• 1D: 3.90%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: -29.60%
• 6M: -34.03%
• 1Y: 25.14%
• 3Y*: 37.02%
• 5Y*: -16.03%
• 10Y*: 3.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DUOT vs. ALLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUOT

DUOT Risk / Return Rank: 51
DUOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
DUOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DUOT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DUOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DUOT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

ALLT

ALLT Risk / Return Rank: 53
ALLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ALLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ALLT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ALLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
ALLT Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUOT vs. ALLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) and Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DUOT	ALLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	0.35	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	0.98	+0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.14	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	0.46	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.79	1.10	-0.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DUOT vs. ALLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is comparable to the ALLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUOT and ALLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DUOT	ALLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32	0.35	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	-0.27	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01	0.06	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	-0.07	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between DUOT and ALLT is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DUOT vs. ALLT - Dividend Comparison

Neither DUOT nor ALLT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DUOT vs. ALLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUOT drawdown since its inception was -97.89%, roughly equal to the maximum ALLT drawdown of -95.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUOT and ALLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUOT	ALLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.89%	-95.42%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.97%	-45.65%	-1.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.66%	-93.72%	+10.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.89%	-93.72%	-4.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.57%	-75.31%	-17.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-87.64%	-64.60%	-23.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.32%	19.32%	0.00%

Volatility

DUOT vs. ALLT - Volatility Comparison

Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) has a higher volatility of 19.42% compared to Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) at 14.30%. This indicates that DUOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUOT	ALLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.42%	14.30%	+5.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.78%	51.89%	+1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.75%	72.34%	+5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.04%	60.41%	+31.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	897.94%	51.98%	+845.96%

Financials

DUOT vs. ALLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Duos Technologies Group, Inc. and Allot Communications Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DUOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Duos Technologies Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.56M and revenue of 10.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.2%.

ALLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a gross profit of 20.31M and revenue of 28.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

DUOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Duos Technologies Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.09M and revenue of 10.59M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.2%.

ALLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported an operating income of 2.57M and revenue of 28.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

DUOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Duos Technologies Group, Inc. reported a net income of -2.87M and revenue of 10.59M, resulting in a net margin of -27.1%.

ALLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a net income of 2.90M and revenue of 28.39M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.