DUNK vs. SGRT
DUNK (Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DUNK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
DUNK vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUNK achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
DUNK
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- 12.98%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUNK vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUNK Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF | 3.11% | -1.72% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUNK and SGRT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUNK vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUNK | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 3.81 | -3.72 |
Drawdowns
DUNK vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUNK drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUNK and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUNK | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -17.87% | -7.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.45% | 0.00% | -6.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -3.11% | -6.97% |
Volatility
DUNK vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUNK | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.97% | 33.41% | -11.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 33.41% | -11.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 33.41% | -11.44% |
DUNK vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUNK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUNK vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
DUNK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DUNK Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUNK and SGRT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DUNK.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for DUNK.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DUNK and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for DUNK and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer