DUNK vs. GARY
DUNK (Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DUNK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
DUNK vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUNK achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 30.72% return.
DUNK
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- 12.98%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARY
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 12.07%
- YTD
- 30.72%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUNK vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUNK Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF | 3.11% | -0.81% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 30.72% | 0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUNK and GARY is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUNK vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUNK | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 4.42 | -4.34 |
Drawdowns
DUNK vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUNK drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUNK and GARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUNK | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -10.28% | -15.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.45% | -0.73% | -5.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -1.69% | -8.39% |
Volatility
DUNK vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUNK | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.97% | 19.25% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 19.25% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 19.25% | +2.72% |
DUNK vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUNK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUNK vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
DUNK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DUNK Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUNK and GARY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DUNK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DUNK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for DUNK.
They also come from different issuers: Dana and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DUNK and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for DUNK and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer