PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUNK vs. GARY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUNK vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUNK achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 30.72% return.


DUNK

1D
-3.22%
1M
12.98%
YTD
3.11%
6M
1.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GARY

1D
-0.73%
1M
12.07%
YTD
30.72%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUNK vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DUNK
Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF
3.11%-0.81%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
30.72%0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DUNK and GARY is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUNK vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DUNK vs. GARY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUNKGARYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

4.42

-4.34

Drawdowns

DUNK vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUNK drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUNK and GARY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUNKGARYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-10.28%

-15.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-0.73%

-5.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.08%

-1.69%

-8.39%

Volatility

DUNK vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUNKGARYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.97%

19.25%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

19.25%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

19.25%

+2.72%

DUNK vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUNK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUNK vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

DUNK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


PositionTTM2025
DUNK
Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUNK and GARY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DUNK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DUNK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for DUNK.

They also come from different issuers: Dana and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DUNK and 0.77% for GARY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUNK and GARY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer