DUNK vs. FMTM
DUNK (Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUNK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Dana, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DUNK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
DUNK vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUNK achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 30.28% return.
DUNK
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -3.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMTM
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 30.28%
- 6M
- 27.32%
- 1Y
- 59.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUNK vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUNK Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF | -2.46% | -1.64% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 30.28% | 8.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUNK and FMTM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUNK vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
DUNK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FMTM
DUNK vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUNK | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUNK vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUNK drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUNK and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUNK | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -12.12% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.50% | -3.61% | -7.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -1.91% | -8.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.18% | — |
Volatility
DUNK vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUNK | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 24.26% | -2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 23.64% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 23.64% | -1.39% |
DUNK vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUNK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUNK vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
DUNK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DUNK Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUNK and FMTM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DUNK.
FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for DUNK.
DUNK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DUNK and 0.45% for FMTM.
Find the right allocation for DUNK and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer