DULL vs. CEPI
DULL (MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DULL is a Inverse Commodities fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt) (-300%), while CEPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. DULL is passively managed, while CEPI is actively managed. Over the past year, DULL returned -61.47% vs 23.11% for CEPI. Their -0.17 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DULL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CEPI.
Performance
DULL vs. CEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DULL achieves a -12.17% return, which is significantly lower than CEPI's 17.46% return.
DULL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 20.95%
- YTD
- -12.17%
- 1Y
- -61.47%
- 3Y*
- -58.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -56.11%
CEPI
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.23M | $1.28M | $1.61M | |
| $408.60K | $774.21K | $681.81K |
DULL vs. CEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DULL MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -12.17% | -80.59% | 2.05% |
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 17.46% | 10.75% | -7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DULL and CEPI is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | -0.17 |
The correlation between DULL and CEPI shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DULL vs. CEPI — Risk / Return Rank
DULL
CEPI
DULL vs. CEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (DULL) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DULL | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.16 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 1.03 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 2.40 | -3.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DULL vs. CEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DULL drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, which is greater than CEPI's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DULL and CEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DULL | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.12% | -29.48% | -67.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.20% | -22.47% | -58.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.33% | -5.73% | -88.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.91% | -8.23% | -52.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.53% | 9.65% | +50.88% |
Volatility
DULL vs. CEPI - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (DULL) has a higher volatility of 17.41% compared to REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) at 11.47%. This indicates that DULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DULL | CEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.41% | 11.47% | +5.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.40% | 23.71% | +38.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.72% | 29.38% | +53.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.09% | 31.91% | +27.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.09% | 31.91% | +27.18% |
DULL vs. CEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CEPI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DULL vs. CEPI - Dividend Comparison
DULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 44.70% | 50.78% |
DULL MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DULL and CEPI have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DULL has higher volatility (17.41%) compared to CEPI (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DULL dropped -97.12% vs CEPI's -29.48%.
On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 23.11% vs -61.47% for DULL. On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, CEPI has been the lower-risk option at 11.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 23.11% return vs -61.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DULL.
CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 44.70%, compared with 0.00% for DULL.
DULL is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while CEPI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DULL and 0.85% for CEPI.
CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DULL and CEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer