DUKQ vs. SCHX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DUKQ (Ocean Park Domestic ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DUKQ is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Over the past year, DUKQ returned 27.09% vs 27.92% for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUKQ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.

Performance

DUKQ vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUKQ achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 11.20% return.

DUKQ

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 5.34%
• YTD: 13.22%
• 6M: 12.99%
• 1Y: 27.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 4.70%
• YTD: 11.20%
• 6M: 10.96%
• 1Y: 27.92%
• 3Y*: 22.63%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: 15.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUKQ vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF	13.22%	5.69%	5.13%
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	11.20%	17.46%	6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKQ and SCHX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2024	0.93

The correlation between DUKQ and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUKQ vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUKQ	SCHX
Technology	30.1%	37.5%
Industrials	11.5%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	9.7%
Financial Services	10.3%	9.9%
Healthcare	8.6%	8.4%
Communication Services	8.0%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	4.5%
Energy	4.9%	3.4%
Utilities	4.1%	2.6%
Real Estate	3.3%	2.0%
Basic Materials	2.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

DUKQ vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUKQ

DUKQ Risk / Return Rank: 70
DUKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DUKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DUKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DUKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DUKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SCHX

SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 71
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUKQ vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DUKQ	SCHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.34	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.19	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.42	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	3.11	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.61	14.13	+0.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DUKQ vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKQ and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DUKQ	SCHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	2.34	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.85	+0.02

Drawdowns

DUKQ vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKQ drawdown since its inception was -18.44%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKQ and SCHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUKQ	SCHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.44%	-34.33%	+15.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.84%	-9.02%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.27%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.90%	-3.97%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	1.98%	-0.12%

Volatility

DUKQ vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.86%. This indicates that DUKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUKQ	SCHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	2.86%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	9.03%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.43%	11.98%	+0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	17.12%	-2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.77%	18.14%	-3.37%

DUKQ vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUKQ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUKQ vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

DUKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than SCHX's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF	0.66%	0.68%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	1.00%	1.09%	1.22%	1.39%	1.64%	1.22%	1.64%	1.82%	2.02%	1.70%	1.92%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUKQ and SCHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, DUKQ and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DUKQ or SCHX?

DUKQ has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to SCHX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKQ dropped -18.44% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

Which ETF is better, DUKQ or SCHX?

On 1-year performance, SCHX leads with 27.92% vs 27.09% for DUKQ. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUKQ or SCHX?

Over the 1-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 27.92% return vs 27.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUKQ or SCHX?

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for DUKQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUKQ or SCHX?

SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.66% for DUKQ.

What is the main difference between DUKQ and SCHX?

They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for DUKQ and 0.03% for SCHX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.