DUKQ vs. DUKZ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

DUKQ (Ocean Park Domestic ETF) and DUKZ (Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUKQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Ocean Park, while DUKZ is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Ocean Park. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DUKQ returned 24.44% vs 7.15% for DUKZ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DUKQ charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for DUKZ.

Performance

DUKQ vs. DUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) and Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUKQ achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than DUKZ's 2.61% return.

DUKQ

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 10.97%
• 1Y: 24.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DUKZ

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 7.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUKQ vs. DUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF	12.61%	5.69%	4.80%
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF	2.61%	4.24%	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKQ and DUKZ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024	0.65

The correlation between DUKQ and DUKZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DUKQ vs. DUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUKQ

DUKQ Risk / Return Rank: 67
DUKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
DUKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DUKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DUKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DUKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

DUKZ

DUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 49
DUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
DUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
DUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
DUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUKQ vs. DUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) and Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUKQ	DUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.56	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.19	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.30	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	2.12	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.78	7.65	+5.14

DUKQ vs. DUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the DUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKQ and DUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUKQ vs. DUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKQ drawdown since its inception was -18.44%, which is greater than DUKZ's maximum drawdown of -4.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKQ and DUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUKQ	DUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.44%	-4.70%	-13.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.84%	-3.39%	-4.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-0.57%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-1.13%	-2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	0.94%	+0.98%

Volatility

DUKQ vs. DUKZ - Volatility Comparison

Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ) at 2.02%. This indicates that DUKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUKQ	DUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	2.02%	+3.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.35%	4.01%	+6.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.18%	4.60%	+8.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.00%	4.43%	+10.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.00%	4.43%	+10.57%

DUKQ vs. DUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUKQ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than DUKZ's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUKQ vs. DUKZ - Dividend Comparison

DUKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than DUKZ's 3.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF	0.66%	0.68%	0.28%
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF	3.82%	4.05%	2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUKQ and DUKZ in my portfolio?

DUKQ and DUKZ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUKQ or DUKZ?

DUKQ has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to DUKZ (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKQ dropped -18.44% vs DUKZ's -4.70%.

Which ETF is better, DUKQ or DUKZ?

On 1-year performance, DUKQ leads with 24.44% vs 7.15% for DUKZ. On fees, DUKQ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, DUKZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUKQ or DUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, DUKQ has performed better with a 24.44% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUKQ or DUKZ?

DUKQ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUKQ or DUKZ?

DUKZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 0.66% for DUKQ.

What is the main difference between DUKQ and DUKZ?

DUKQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DUKZ is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for DUKQ and 1.03% for DUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DUKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.