DUKH vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

DUKH (Ocean Park High Income ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - DUKH is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Ocean Park, while UCO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (200%). DUKH is actively managed, while UCO is passively managed. Over the past year, DUKH returned 4.49% vs 53.08% for UCO. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. DUKH charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

DUKH vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUKH achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 77.33% return.

DUKH

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 4.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: 4.80%
• 1M: -24.44%
• YTD: 77.33%
• 6M: 71.99%
• 1Y: 53.08%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 19.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUKH vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DUKH Ocean Park High Income ETF	0.31%	2.85%	2.81%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	77.33%	-29.75%	-18.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKH and UCO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024	-0.17

The correlation between DUKH and UCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to -0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DUKH vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUKH

DUKH Risk / Return Rank: 37
DUKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
DUKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
DUKH Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DUKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
DUKH Martin Ratio Rank: 36

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 29
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUKH vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUKH	UCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	0.95	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	1.50	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.18	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.44	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.01	3.23	+1.78

DUKH vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKH Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKH and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUKH vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKH drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKH and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUKH	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-99.86%	+94.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-37.09%	+34.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-96.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-86.24%	+85.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.12%	-82.11%	+80.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	16.46%	-15.56%

Volatility

DUKH vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) is 1.09%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 18.06%. This indicates that DUKH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUKH	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	18.06%	-16.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.88%	48.70%	-45.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.50%	56.42%	-52.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.78%	60.21%	-56.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.78%	317.66%	-313.88%

DUKH vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUKH has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUKH vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

DUKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DUKH Ocean Park High Income ETF	5.64%	6.12%	2.77%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUKH and UCO in my portfolio?

DUKH and UCO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUKH or UCO?

UCO has higher volatility (18.06%) compared to DUKH (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKH dropped -5.70% vs UCO's -99.86%.

Which ETF is better, DUKH or UCO?

On 1-year performance, UCO leads with 53.08% vs 4.49% for DUKH. On fees, UCO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DUKH has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUKH or UCO?

Over the 1-year period, UCO has performed better with a 53.08% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUKH or UCO?

UCO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUKH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUKH or UCO?

DUKH has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

What is the main difference between DUKH and UCO?

DUKH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while UCO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUKH and 0.95% for UCO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DUKH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.