DUK vs. K
DUK (Duke Energy Corporation) and K (Kellogg Company) are both stocks. DUK operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while K operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DUK vs. K - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DUK
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 11.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
K
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUK vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 7.81% | 12.72% | 15.56% | -1.63% | 2.03% | 19.11% | 4.77% | 10.29% | 7.41% | 12.96% |
K Kellogg Company | 0.00% | 5.99% | 49.75% | -7.44% | 14.35% | 7.44% | -6.78% | 26.08% | -13.32% | -4.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUK and K is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DUK and K has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
DUK:
$96.77B
K:
$29.20B
DUK:
$6.61
K:
$3.65
DUK:
18.80
K:
22.87
DUK:
1.47
K:
3.84
DUK:
2.90
K:
2.30
DUK:
1.81
K:
6.95
DUK:
$33.29B
K:
$12.67B
DUK:
$19.45B
K:
$4.41B
DUK:
$15.91B
K:
$2.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUK vs. K — Risk / Return Rank
DUK
K
DUK vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUK | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUK | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | — | — |
Drawdowns
DUK vs. K - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUK | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.12% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.85% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | — | — |
Volatility
DUK vs. K - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUK | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.38% | — | — |
Dividends
DUK vs. K - Dividend Comparison
DUK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than K's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUK Duke Energy Corporation | 3.43% | 3.60% | 3.84% | 4.18% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 4.17% | 4.11% | 4.21% | 4.15% | 4.33% | 4.54% |
K Kellogg Company | 1.39% | 2.76% | 2.79% | 10.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% | 3.66% | 3.27% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.74% |
Financials
DUK vs. K - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Duke Energy Corporation and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DUK vs. K - Profitability Comparison
DUK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.
K - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.
DUK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.
K - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
DUK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.
K - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DUK and K have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DUK and K
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer