DUHP vs. SCHX
DUHP (DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DUHP is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUHP returned 19.22%/yr vs 22.38%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUHP charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
DUHP vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
DUHP
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
DUHP vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF | 9.06% | 13.77% | 19.49% | 21.11% | -2.56% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -10.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUHP and SCHX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DUHP and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DUHP vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUHP
SCHX
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
DUHP
SCHX
Industrials
DUHP
SCHX
Healthcare
DUHP
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
DUHP
SCHX
Financial Services
DUHP
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
DUHP
SCHX
Communication Services
DUHP
SCHX
Energy
DUHP
SCHX
Utilities
DUHP
SCHX
Basic Materials
DUHP
SCHX
Real Estate
DUHP
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUHP vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
DUHP
SCHX
DUHP vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUHP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 2.29 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 3.14 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.05 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.95 | 13.85 | -3.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUHP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.29 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.85 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
DUHP vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUHP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.05% | -34.33% | +14.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -9.02% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.86% | -19.04% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.70% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -3.97% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 1.98% | +0.07% |
Volatility
DUHP vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is 2.52%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that DUHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUHP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 2.91% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 9.02% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 11.99% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 17.12% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 18.15% | -1.91% |
DUHP vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DUHP vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUHP DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF | 0.97% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.51% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DUHP and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to DUHP (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 3-year performance, SCHX leads with 22.38% vs 19.22% for DUHP. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DUHP has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 22.38% return vs 19.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DUHP.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.97% for DUHP.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUHP and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer