PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUBS vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUBS vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 3.81% return.


DUBS

1D
0.13%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
9.42%
6M
8.51%
1Y
25.96%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
3.81%
6M
3.64%
1Y
9.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUBS vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DUBS and BUFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.91

The correlation between DUBS and BUFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUBS vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUBS vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUBSBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.53

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.38

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.99

19.91

-5.92

DUBS vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the BUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUBS and BUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUBS vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUBSBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-2.87%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-2.87%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

-0.61%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-0.25%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

0.49%

+1.37%

Volatility

DUBS vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) at 1.22%. This indicates that DUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUBSBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

1.22%

+4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

3.39%

+7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

4.03%

+9.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

4.03%

+10.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.70%

4.03%

+10.67%

DUBS vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUBS vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
1.99%2.06%2.52%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DUBS and BUFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DUBS has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to BUFX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs BUFX's -2.87%.

On 1-year performance, DUBS leads with 25.96% vs 9.64% for BUFX. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BUFX has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 25.96% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

DUBS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Aptus and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.96% for BUFX.

BUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUBS and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer