DUBS vs. ADME
DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUBS is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Aptus, while ADME is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index. DUBS is actively managed, while ADME is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUBS returned 21.04%/yr vs 15.83%/yr for ADME. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ADME.
Performance
DUBS vs. ADME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUBS achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than ADME's 9.26% return.
DUBS
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.96%
ADME
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 16.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $783.00K | $574.99K | $724.82K | |
| $881.48K | $1.25M | $931.41K |
DUBS vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 13.77% | 19.28% | 24.08% | 7.89% |
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 9.26% | 10.28% | 22.11% | 7.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUBS and ADME is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2023 | 0.96 |
The correlation between DUBS and ADME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUBS vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank
DUBS
ADME
DUBS vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUBS | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 2.22 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.49 | 8.38 | +6.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUBS vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum ADME drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and ADME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUBS | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -27.49% | +9.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -7.49% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.48% | -15.67% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.22% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -7.83% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.98% | -0.06% |
Volatility
DUBS vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) at 3.51%. This indicates that DUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUBS | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 3.51% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 8.96% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.81% | 11.07% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 13.04% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 14.46% | +0.18% |
DUBS vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ADME's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUBS vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison
DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than ADME's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.26% | 0.41% | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.32% | 0.69% |
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 1.97% | 2.06% | 2.52% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DUBS and ADME move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DUBS has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to ADME (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUBS dropped -18.48% vs ADME's -27.49%.
On 3-year performance, DUBS leads with 21.04% vs 15.83% for ADME. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ADME has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 21.04% return vs 15.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.
DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.35% for ADME.
DUBS is categorized as Derivative Income, while ADME is Equity Hedged. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.79% for ADME.
DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUBS and ADME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer