DUBS vs. ACYS
DUBS (Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DUBS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
DUBS vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DUBS
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.96%
ACYS
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.16M | $7.21M | $6.15M | |
| $881.48K | $1.25M | $931.41K |
DUBS vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 7.79% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUBS and ACYS is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUBS vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank
DUBS
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DUBS vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUBS | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUBS vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUBS drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUBS and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUBS | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -0.78% | -17.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -0.16% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | — | — |
Volatility
DUBS vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUBS | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.81% | 3.76% | +10.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 3.76% | +10.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 3.76% | +10.88% |
DUBS vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUBS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUBS vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
DUBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than ACYS's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF | 1.97% | 2.06% | 2.52% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUBS and ACYS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.27% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DUBS and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for DUBS and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer