PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTSVX vs. SSCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTSVX vs. SSCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTSVX achieves a 16.01% return, which is significantly higher than SSCDX's 14.71% return. Over the past 10 years, DTSVX has underperformed SSCDX with an annualized return of 9.04%, while SSCDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.60% annualized return.


DTSVX

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.21%
YTD
16.01%
6M
18.23%
1Y
38.00%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
9.04%

SSCDX

1D
-0.92%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
14.71%
6M
15.39%
1Y
32.60%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTSVX vs. SSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTSVX
Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio
16.01%10.47%7.63%17.45%-10.31%32.04%0.45%21.31%-16.42%8.86%
SSCDX
Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund
14.71%12.90%15.50%15.50%-17.15%23.46%16.21%27.12%-17.10%13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DTSVX and SSCDX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2015

0.93

The correlation between DTSVX and SSCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTSVX vs. SSCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTSVX
DTSVX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DTSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DTSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SSCDX
SSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTSVX vs. SSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTSVXSSCDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

2.00

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

2.82

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

3.88

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.61

13.72

-1.11

DTSVX vs. SSCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTSVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the SSCDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTSVX and SSCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTSVXSSCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.00

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.44

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.51

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.48

-0.10

Drawdowns

DTSVX vs. SSCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTSVX drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, which is greater than SSCDX's maximum drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTSVX and SSCDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTSVXSSCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.29%

-38.79%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-8.22%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.88%

-23.99%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.88%

-27.06%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.65%

-38.79%

-10.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-3.89%

+3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-7.00%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.32%

+0.61%

Volatility

DTSVX vs. SSCDX - Volatility Comparison

Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTSVXSSCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

4.64%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

11.95%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

16.27%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.30%

20.08%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

20.70%

+2.72%

DTSVX vs. SSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DTSVX and SSCDX have an expense ratio of 1.35%.


Dividends

DTSVX vs. SSCDX - Dividend Comparison

DTSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.44%, more than SSCDX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTSVX
Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio
9.44%10.95%9.03%3.92%11.16%0.93%2.30%0.66%6.28%12.18%2.20%5.98%
SSCDX
Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund
1.87%2.21%1.79%1.07%4.26%8.47%0.77%1.33%2.69%0.85%1.16%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTSVX and SSCDX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSCDX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to DTSVX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTSVX dropped -62.29% vs SSCDX's -38.79%.

DTSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTSVX and SSCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer