DTSVX vs. DTLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX) and Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX).
DTSVX is managed by Wilshire Mutual Funds. It was launched on Sep 30, 1992. DTLGX is managed by Wilshire Mutual Funds. It was launched on Sep 30, 1992.
Performance
DTSVX vs. DTLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DTSVX vs. DTLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTSVX Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio | 2.33% | 10.47% | 7.63% | 17.45% | -10.31% | 32.04% | 0.45% | 21.31% | -16.42% | 8.86% |
DTLGX Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio | -13.65% | 21.95% | 35.90% | 39.81% | -31.60% | 22.61% | 38.78% | 28.64% | -2.20% | 27.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTSVX achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than DTLGX's -13.65% return. Over the past 10 years, DTSVX has underperformed DTLGX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while DTLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.37% annualized return.
DTSVX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 23.46%
- 3Y*
- 12.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
DTLGX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- YTD
- -13.65%
- 6M
- -13.38%
- 1Y
- 17.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 14.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DTSVX vs. DTLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTSVX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DTLGX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DTSVX vs. DTLGX — Risk / Return Rank
DTSVX
DTLGX
DTSVX vs. DTLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX) and Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTSVX | DTLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 0.74 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.20 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 0.83 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | 2.97 | +2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTSVX | DTLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.74 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.48 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.68 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.51 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between DTSVX and DTLGX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DTSVX vs. DTLGX - Dividend Comparison
DTSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.70%, less than DTLGX's 30.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTSVX Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio | 10.70% | 10.95% | 9.03% | 3.92% | 11.16% | 0.93% | 2.30% | 0.66% | 6.28% | 12.18% | 2.20% | 5.98% |
DTLGX Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio | 30.01% | 25.91% | 13.48% | 0.09% | 20.78% | 22.68% | 21.08% | 10.06% | 16.96% | 9.01% | 12.35% | 11.48% |
Drawdowns
DTSVX vs. DTLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTSVX drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, which is greater than DTLGX's maximum drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTSVX and DTLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTSVX | DTLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.29% | -56.57% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -17.05% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.88% | -35.84% | +8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.65% | -35.84% | -13.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.39% | -17.05% | +8.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -13.92% | +3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 4.76% | -1.01% |
Volatility
DTSVX vs. DTLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wilshire Small Company Value Portfolio (DTSVX) is 5.33%, while Wilshire Large Company Growth Portfolio (DTLGX) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that DTSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DTSVX | DTLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 6.03% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.93% | 12.99% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | 23.15% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 21.97% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 21.20% | +2.22% |