PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTRE vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTRE vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTRE achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.94% return. Over the past 10 years, DTRE has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 2.38%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.


DTRE

1D
-0.90%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
6.06%
6M
7.52%
1Y
8.38%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
-1.51%
10Y*
2.38%

QCLN

1D
-0.41%
1M
16.40%
YTD
52.94%
6M
50.79%
1Y
120.21%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTRE vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTRE
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF
6.06%8.32%-9.71%13.89%-26.53%27.43%-8.81%21.84%-4.96%10.88%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
52.94%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between DTRE and QCLN is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between DTRE and QCLN has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DTRE vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DTRE
QCLN

Real Estate

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

9.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

13.2%

Financial Services

-

1.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

30.2%

Technology

-

20.8%

Utilities

-

13.2%

Real Estate

DTRE
100.0%
QCLN

-

Basic Materials

DTRE

-

QCLN
9.4%

Communication Services

DTRE

-

QCLN

-

Consumer Cyclical

DTRE

-

QCLN
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

DTRE

-

QCLN

-

Energy

DTRE

-

QCLN
13.2%

Financial Services

DTRE

-

QCLN
1.9%

Healthcare

DTRE

-

QCLN

-

Industrials

DTRE

-

QCLN
30.2%

Technology

DTRE

-

QCLN
20.8%

Utilities

DTRE

-

QCLN
13.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTRE vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTRE
DTRE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTRE vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTREQCLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.48

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

7.62

-6.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.63

26.28

-23.65

DTRE vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTRE and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTREQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

3.49

-2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.06

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.50

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.20

-0.10

Drawdowns

DTRE vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTRE drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTRE and QCLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTREQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.26%

-76.18%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-15.86%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-56.08%

+35.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.62%

-69.49%

+34.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

-71.73%

+28.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.21%

-20.99%

+7.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.89%

-43.45%

+26.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

4.59%

-1.40%

Volatility

DTRE vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE) is 3.92%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that DTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTREQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

12.56%

-8.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

26.02%

-16.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

34.88%

-21.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

37.97%

-19.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

34.91%

-16.38%

DTRE vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DTRE and QCLN have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

DTRE vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

DTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTRE
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF
3.39%3.42%3.75%2.56%2.49%2.64%0.79%4.97%3.38%3.07%4.16%1.74%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.15%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTRE and QCLN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCLN has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to DTRE (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTRE dropped -72.26% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

On 10-year performance, QCLN leads with 17.39% vs 2.38% for DTRE. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, DTRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTRE and QCLN have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

DTRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

DTRE is categorized as REIT, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. DTRE tracks Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate Index - Benchmark TR Net, while QCLN tracks NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy.

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTRE and QCLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer