DTRE vs. BLDG
DTRE (First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. DTRE is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DTRE returned -1.51%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for BLDG. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DTRE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
DTRE vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DTRE having a 6.06% return and BLDG slightly lower at 5.95%.
DTRE
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 7.52%
- 1Y
- 8.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- -1.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.38%
BLDG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- —
DTRE vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTRE First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF | 6.06% | 8.32% | -9.71% | 13.89% | -26.53% | 27.43% | 16.22% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.95% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTRE and BLDG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between DTRE and BLDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DTRE vs. BLDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTRE
BLDG
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
DTRE
BLDG
Basic Materials
DTRE
-
BLDG
-
Communication Services
DTRE
-
BLDG
-
Consumer Cyclical
DTRE
-
BLDG
-
Consumer Defensive
DTRE
-
BLDG
-
Energy
DTRE
-
BLDG
-
Financial Services
DTRE
-
BLDG
Healthcare
DTRE
-
BLDG
-
Industrials
DTRE
-
BLDG
-
Technology
DTRE
-
BLDG
-
Utilities
DTRE
-
BLDG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTRE vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
DTRE
BLDG
DTRE vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.16 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.02 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 3.60 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.93 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.15 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.45 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
DTRE vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTRE drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTRE and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.26% | -27.25% | -45.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -10.08% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.65% | -18.57% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.62% | -27.25% | -7.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.21% | -2.76% | -10.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.89% | -9.23% | -7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 2.86% | +0.33% |
Volatility
DTRE vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 3.60%. This indicates that DTRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTRE | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.60% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 8.23% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 11.07% | +2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 15.26% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 15.54% | +2.99% |
DTRE vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTRE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTRE vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
DTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than BLDG's 5.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.72% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DTRE First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF | 3.39% | 3.42% | 3.75% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 2.64% | 0.79% | 4.97% | 3.38% | 3.07% | 4.16% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTRE and BLDG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DTRE has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to BLDG (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTRE dropped -72.26% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 5-year performance, BLDG leads with 2.24% vs -1.51% for DTRE. On fees, BLDG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BLDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 2.24% return vs -1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLDG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DTRE.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 3.39% for DTRE.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DTRE and 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTRE and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer