PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTRE vs. UCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTRE vs. UCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE) and First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTRE achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly higher than UCON's 0.76% return.


DTRE

1D
1.03%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.24%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
-1.17%
10Y*
2.67%

UCON

1D
0.02%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.76%
6M
0.92%
1Y
5.01%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTRE vs. UCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DTRE
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF
7.24%8.32%-9.71%13.89%-26.53%27.43%-8.81%21.84%-5.24%
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
0.76%7.00%4.69%7.72%-5.72%1.02%6.54%7.39%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DTRE and UCON is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018

0.28

Over the past year, DTRE and UCON have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTRE vs. UCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTRE
DTRE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

UCON
UCON Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
UCON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCON Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCON Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UCON Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCON Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTRE vs. UCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE) and First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTREUCONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.31

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

2.05

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

7.85

-5.64

DTRE vs. UCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the UCON Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTRE and UCON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTRE vs. UCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTRE drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, which is greater than UCON's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTRE and UCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTREUCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.26%

-15.31%

-56.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-2.45%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-2.85%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.62%

-9.60%

-25.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.24%

-0.43%

-11.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.87%

-1.48%

-15.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

0.64%

+2.59%

Volatility

DTRE vs. UCON - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF (DTRE) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) at 0.85%. This indicates that DTRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTREUCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

0.85%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

2.37%

+8.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.90%

2.99%

+10.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

3.90%

+14.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

5.88%

+12.65%

DTRE vs. UCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTRE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UCON's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTRE vs. UCON - Dividend Comparison

DTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than UCON's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTRE
First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate ETF
3.35%3.42%3.75%2.56%2.49%2.64%0.79%4.97%3.38%3.07%4.16%1.74%
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
4.66%4.63%4.95%4.75%3.12%2.20%3.14%3.25%1.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTRE and UCON have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTRE has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to UCON (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTRE dropped -72.26% vs UCON's -15.31%.

On 5-year performance, UCON leads with 2.78% vs -1.17% for DTRE. On fees, DTRE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, UCON has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UCON has performed better with a 2.78% return vs -1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTRE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for UCON.

UCON has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 3.35% for DTRE.

DTRE is categorized as REIT, while UCON is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DTRE and 0.86% for UCON.

UCON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTRE and UCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer