DTGRX vs. FDTRX
DTGRX (BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund) and FDTRX (Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DTGRX returned 21.29%/yr vs 16.87%/yr for FDTRX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DTGRX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FDTRX.
Performance
DTGRX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTGRX achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly higher than FDTRX's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, DTGRX has outperformed FDTRX with an annualized return of 21.29%, while FDTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.87% annualized return.
DTGRX
- 1D
- 6.06%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 1Y
- 35.22%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 21.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.59%
FDTRX
- 1D
- 4.48%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- 16.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
DTGRX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund | 18.40% | 27.20% | 30.78% | 59.98% | -46.44% | 12.62% | 69.80% | 52.82% | -1.47% | 42.50% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | 1.72% | 18.97% | 31.01% | 44.92% | -40.07% | 12.90% | 58.22% | 36.84% | 3.22% | 39.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTGRX and FDTRX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013 | 0.94 |
The correlation between DTGRX and FDTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTGRX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank
DTGRX
FDTRX
DTGRX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DTGRX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.07 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 0.38 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.37 | 1.10 | +4.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DTGRX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTGRX drawdown since its inception was -83.23%, which is greater than FDTRX's maximum drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTGRX and FDTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTGRX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.23% | -48.10% | -35.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.25% | -20.39% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.31% | -26.19% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.92% | -48.10% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.92% | -48.10% | -4.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.30% | -10.50% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.57% | -9.10% | -29.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | 7.02% | -1.23% |
Volatility
DTGRX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) at 8.76%. This indicates that DTGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTGRX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.50% | 8.76% | +2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.30% | 19.68% | +4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.12% | 23.82% | +4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.65% | 26.75% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.48% | 24.87% | +3.61% |
DTGRX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTGRX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTGRX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison
DTGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, which matches FDTRX's 10.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund | 10.17% | 12.04% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.32% | 5.76% | 34.25% | 30.17% | 9.91% | 10.19% | 6.52% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | 10.21% | 10.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 2.80% | 1.71% | 3.44% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DTGRX and FDTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DTGRX has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to FDTRX (8.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTGRX dropped -83.23% vs FDTRX's -48.10%.
DTGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTGRX and FDTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer