DTEC vs. BFOR
DTEC (ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF) and BFOR (ALPS Barron's 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while BFOR is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Barron's 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DTEC returned 2.70%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for BFOR. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BFOR.
Performance
DTEC vs. BFOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTEC achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than BFOR's 10.43% return.
DTEC
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- —
BFOR
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
DTEC vs. BFOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 6.02% | 7.21% | 9.89% | 25.03% | -31.29% | 4.89% | 44.12% | 35.44% | -4.96% |
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 10.43% | 13.85% | 17.81% | 18.19% | -15.92% | 30.71% | 17.60% | 21.30% | -13.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTEC and BFOR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DTEC and BFOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
DTEC vs. BFOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTEC
BFOR
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
DTEC
BFOR
Industrials
DTEC
BFOR
Healthcare
DTEC
BFOR
Financial Services
DTEC
BFOR
Energy
DTEC
BFOR
Utilities
DTEC
BFOR
Communication Services
DTEC
BFOR
Real Estate
DTEC
BFOR
-
Consumer Cyclical
DTEC
BFOR
Basic Materials
DTEC
-
BFOR
Consumer Defensive
DTEC
-
BFOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTEC vs. BFOR — Risk / Return Rank
DTEC
BFOR
DTEC vs. BFOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTEC | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 1.62 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 2.39 | -1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.28 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 2.63 | -2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | 9.66 | -8.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTEC | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 1.62 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.53 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.59 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
DTEC vs. BFOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTEC drawdown since its inception was -42.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BFOR drawdown of -41.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTEC and BFOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTEC | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.00% | -41.27% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.31% | -8.98% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | -21.91% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.00% | -25.93% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | 0.00% | -2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -6.43% | -6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.70% | 2.45% | +6.25% |
Volatility
DTEC vs. BFOR - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) at 3.56%. This indicates that DTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTEC | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 3.56% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 10.63% | +3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 14.79% | +3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 19.41% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 20.42% | +2.45% |
DTEC vs. BFOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTEC vs. BFOR - Dividend Comparison
DTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than BFOR's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.69% | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.86% |
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.45% | 0.27% | 0.02% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTEC and BFOR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DTEC has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to BFOR (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTEC dropped -42.00% vs BFOR's -41.27%.
On 5-year performance, BFOR leads with 10.24% vs 2.70% for DTEC. On fees, DTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BFOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BFOR has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 2.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BFOR.
BFOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.03% for DTEC.
DTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while BFOR is Mid Cap Blend Equities. DTEC tracks Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while BFOR tracks Barron's 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTEC and 0.65% for BFOR.
BFOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTEC and BFOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer