PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTDRX vs. LTSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTDRX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTDRX achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 4.65% return.


DTDRX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.26%
6M
7.53%
YTD
11.23%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.62%

LTSTX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.78%
YTD
4.65%
1Y
10.25%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
7.81%
ALL TIME*
6.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DTDRX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DTDRX
Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
11.23%19.28%17.13%21.29%-15.25%20.99%13.15%0.00%
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
4.65%12.16%11.91%13.30%-15.23%10.91%13.70%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DTDRX and LTSTX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.93

The correlation between DTDRX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTDRX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DTDRX
DTDRX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DTDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DTDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

LTSTX
LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DTDRX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTDRXLTSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.91

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.23

8.26

+2.97

DTDRX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTDRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTDRX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTDRX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTDRX drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTDRX and LTSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTDRXLTSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.33%

-48.17%

+14.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-5.24%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-8.12%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-21.01%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.61%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-6.11%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.21%

+0.78%

Volatility

DTDRX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) at 1.91%. This indicates that DTDRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTDRXLTSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

1.91%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

5.99%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

7.18%

+4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

9.23%

+5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

9.76%

+9.30%

DTDRX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTDRX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DTDRX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

DTDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than LTSTX's 11.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTDRX
Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.85%1.31%2.07%1.94%2.01%1.53%2.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
11.65%12.19%9.74%4.26%8.00%7.66%5.25%6.91%6.39%4.75%3.65%8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTDRX and LTSTX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTDRX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to LTSTX (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTDRX dropped -33.33% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

DTDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTDRX and LTSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer