PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTCR vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTCR vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTCR achieves a 53.70% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return.


DTCR

1D
0.75%
1M
10.27%
YTD
53.70%
6M
54.91%
1Y
82.28%
3Y*
37.06%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*

QYLD

1D
0.00%
1M
1.40%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.91%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTCR vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
53.70%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%5.81%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%10.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DTCR and QYLD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020

0.61

The correlation between DTCR and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

DTCR vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DTCR
QYLD

Real Estate

56.8%
0.1%

Technology

40.8%
53.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
15.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Real Estate

DTCR
56.8%
QYLD
0.1%

Technology

DTCR
40.8%
QYLD
53.8%

Communication Services

DTCR
2.5%
QYLD
15.8%

Basic Materials

DTCR

-

QYLD
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DTCR

-

QYLD
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

DTCR

-

QYLD
7.7%

Energy

DTCR

-

QYLD
0.6%

Financial Services

DTCR

-

QYLD
0.2%

Healthcare

DTCR

-

QYLD
4.2%

Industrials

DTCR

-

QYLD
2.8%

Utilities

DTCR

-

QYLD
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTCR vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTCR vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTCRQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.63

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.42

4.79

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.18

28.10

-7.92

DTCR vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTCR Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTCR and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTCRQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

2.78

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.58

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.59

+0.18

Drawdowns

DTCR vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTCR drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTCR and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTCRQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-24.75%

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-4.97%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-19.06%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

-24.61%

-14.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.36%

-3.84%

-8.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

0.85%

+3.24%

Volatility

DTCR vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.84%. This indicates that DTCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTCRQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.06%

1.84%

+5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

7.12%

+9.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.85%

8.57%

+13.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.83%

14.70%

+7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

15.49%

+6.40%

DTCR vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTCR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTCR vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.72%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTCR and QYLD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTCR has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to QYLD (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTCR dropped -38.98% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 5-year performance, DTCR leads with 15.70% vs 8.43% for QYLD. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 0.72% for DTCR.

DTCR is categorized as REIT, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTCR and 0.60% for QYLD.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTCR and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer