DTCR vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) and NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTCR is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DTCR returned 84.73% vs 41.42% for NUKZ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DTCR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NUKZ.

Performance

DTCR vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTCR achieves a 52.56% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's 13.31% return.

DTCR

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 11.31%
• YTD: 52.56%
• 6M: 54.49%
• 1Y: 84.73%
• 3Y*: 36.32%
• 5Y*: 15.53%
• 10Y*: —

NUKZ

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 41.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTCR vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF	52.56%	28.99%	16.35%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	13.31%	56.57%	62.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DTCR and NUKZ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.59

The correlation between DTCR and NUKZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

DTCR vs. NUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DTCR	NUKZ
Real Estate	56.8%	-
Technology	40.8%	1.4%
Communication Services	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	12.9%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	45.9%
Utilities	-	35.8%

Return for Risk

DTCR vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTCR

DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 92
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 40
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 34
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTCR vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DTCR	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.90	1.40	+2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.71	2.02	+2.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.23	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.61	2.52	+4.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.78	6.34	+14.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DTCR vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTCR Sharpe Ratio is 3.90, which is higher than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTCR and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DTCR	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90	1.40	+2.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.75	-0.99

Drawdowns

DTCR vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTCR drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTCR and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTCR	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.98%	-33.03%	-5.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.89%	-16.51%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-5.61%	+4.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.37%	-6.01%	-6.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.09%	6.55%	-2.46%

Volatility

DTCR vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) is 7.16%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that DTCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTCR	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.16%	10.30%	-3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.92%	22.05%	-5.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.84%	29.74%	-7.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.83%	32.70%	-10.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.90%	32.70%	-10.80%

DTCR vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTCR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DTCR vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than NUKZ's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF	0.72%	1.10%	1.72%	1.18%	2.57%	1.27%	0.30%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.80%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTCR and NUKZ in my portfolio?

DTCR and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DTCR or NUKZ?

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to DTCR (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTCR dropped -38.98% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which ETF is better, DTCR or NUKZ?

On 1-year performance, DTCR leads with 84.73% vs 41.42% for NUKZ. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DTCR has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DTCR or NUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 84.73% return vs 41.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DTCR or NUKZ?

DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DTCR or NUKZ?

NUKZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.72% for DTCR.

What is the main difference between DTCR and NUKZ?

DTCR is categorized as REIT, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTCR and 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.