PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTAN vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTAN vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTAN achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.


DTAN

1D
0.54%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.32%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.51%
1M
45.64%
YTD
17.65%
6M
21.49%
1Y
115.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTAN vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DTAN and WNTR is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTAN vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTAN
DTAN Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
DTAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTAN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DTAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTAN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTAN vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTANWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.33

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.73

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

6.99

-3.22

DTAN vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTAN and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTAN vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTAN drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTAN and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTANWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.58%

-42.65%

+25.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-42.65%

+29.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-4.02%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-20.87%

+17.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

16.66%

-12.74%

Volatility

DTAN vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) is 4.44%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that DTAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTANWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

18.14%

-13.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

46.41%

-34.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

53.16%

-37.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

53.31%

-35.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

53.31%

-35.73%

DTAN vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTAN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTAN vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

DTAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


DTAN and WNTR have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to DTAN (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTAN dropped -17.58% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 14.75% for DTAN. On fees, DTAN is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, DTAN has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 14.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTAN is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 1.72% for DTAN.

DTAN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Sparkline Capital and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DTAN and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTAN and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer