DTAN vs. IFLO
DTAN (Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, DTAN returned 14.75% vs 32.28% for IFLO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DTAN charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
DTAN vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTAN achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.
DTAN
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 14.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTAN vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DTAN Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF | 1.79% | 12.74% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 16.93% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTAN and IFLO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTAN vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
DTAN
IFLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DTAN vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DTAN | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DTAN vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTAN drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTAN and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTAN | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.58% | -6.44% | -11.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.32% | -6.44% | -6.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -3.37% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -1.25% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | — | — |
Volatility
DTAN vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTAN | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 14.75% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 14.75% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 14.75% | +2.83% |
DTAN vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTAN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTAN vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
DTAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DTAN Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF | 1.72% | 1.58% | 0.67% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.51% | 0.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTAN and IFLO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 14.75% for DTAN. On fees, DTAN is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 14.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTAN is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.
DTAN has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: Sparkline Capital and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DTAN and 0.56% for IFLO.
Find the right allocation for DTAN and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer