PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DT vs. INVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DT vs. INVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and Innoviva, Inc. (INVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DT achieves a -4.43% return, which is significantly lower than INVA's 12.51% return.


DT

1D
0.41%
1M
3.65%
YTD
-4.43%
6M
-6.25%
1Y
-25.57%
3Y*
-6.83%
5Y*
-6.20%
10Y*

INVA

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.50%
YTD
12.51%
6M
12.06%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
7.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DT vs. INVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DT
Dynatrace, Inc.
-4.43%-20.26%-0.62%42.79%-36.54%39.47%71.03%-0.78%
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
12.51%15.22%8.17%21.06%-23.19%39.23%-12.50%19.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DT and INVA is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.14

The correlation between DT and INVA shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DT:

$12.38B

INVA:

$1.91B

EPS

DT:

$0.73

INVA:

$5.94

PE Ratio

DT:

56.61

INVA:

3.79

PEG Ratio

DT:

0.78

INVA:

0.02

PS Ratio

DT:

6.21

INVA:

4.50

PB Ratio

DT:

4.74

INVA:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

DT:

$2.02B

INVA:

$424.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DT:

$1.65B

INVA:

$323.16M

EBITDA (TTM)

DT:

$289.14M

INVA:

$438.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DT vs. INVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DT
DT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
DT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

INVA
INVA Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DT vs. INVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and Innoviva, Inc. (INVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTINVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.06

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

0.23

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

0.54

-1.58

DT vs. INVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DT Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the INVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DT and INVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DT vs. INVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DT drawdown since its inception was -61.77%, smaller than the maximum INVA drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DT and INVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTINVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.77%

-84.32%

+22.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.87%

-22.32%

-20.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.16%

-23.53%

-24.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.77%

-47.01%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.41%

-29.67%

-17.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.78%

-44.69%

+13.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.64%

9.65%

+14.99%

Volatility

DT vs. INVA - Volatility Comparison

Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) has a higher volatility of 12.14% compared to Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) at 6.96%. This indicates that DT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTINVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.14%

6.96%

+5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.31%

17.05%

+16.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.32%

28.94%

+10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.75%

27.28%

+13.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.51%

33.86%

+12.65%

Dividends

DT vs. INVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither DT nor INVA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DT
Dynatrace, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.12%

Financials

DT vs. INVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dynatrace, Inc. and Innoviva, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
531.72M
97.99M
(DT) Total Revenue
(INVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DT and INVA have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DT has higher volatility (12.14%) compared to INVA (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DT dropped -61.77% vs INVA's -84.32%.

INVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DT and INVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer