DT vs. CRM
DT (Dynatrace, Inc.) and CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, DT returned -7.05%/yr vs -5.00%/yr for CRM. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
DT vs. CRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DT achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -30.18% return.
DT
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- 6M
- 16.36%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- -15.76%
- 3Y*
- -7.05%
- 5Y*
- -7.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.22%
CRM
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 12.74%
- 6M
- -12.88%
- YTD
- -30.18%
- 1Y
- -28.16%
- 3Y*
- -5.84%
- 5Y*
- -5.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.36B | $2.15B | $2.56B | |
| $181.38M | $180.50M | $231.39M |
DT vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 2.26% | -20.26% | -0.62% | 42.79% | -36.54% | 39.47% | 71.03% | -0.78% |
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | -30.18% | -20.25% | 27.76% | 98.46% | -47.83% | 14.20% | 36.82% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DT and CRM is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.58 |
The correlation between DT and CRM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
DT:
$12.92B
CRM:
$150.71B
DT:
$0.73
CRM:
$8.68
DT:
60.47
CRM:
21.20
DT:
0.84
CRM:
0.04
DT:
6.63
CRM:
3.97
DT:
5.07
CRM:
4.68
DT:
$2.02B
CRM:
$42.83B
DT:
$1.65B
CRM:
$33.25B
DT:
$289.14M
CRM:
$12.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DT vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank
DT
CRM
DT vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DT | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.90 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.65 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | -1.20 | +0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DT vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DT drawdown since its inception was -61.77%, smaller than the maximum CRM drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DT and CRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DT | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.77% | -70.50% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.30% | -43.33% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.16% | -58.67% | +10.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.77% | -58.67% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.73% | -49.34% | +5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.01% | -16.37% | -14.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.77% | 23.55% | -2.78% |
Volatility
DT vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) is 10.57%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that DT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DT | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.57% | 14.40% | -3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.04% | 33.51% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.56% | 41.11% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.99% | 37.77% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.41% | 35.70% | +10.71% |
Dividends
DT vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison
DT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.48% |
DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
DT vs. CRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dynatrace, Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DT vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison
DT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported a gross profit of 430.32M and revenue of 531.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.
CRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.
DT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.34M and revenue of 531.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
CRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
DT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported a net income of 76.21M and revenue of 531.72M, resulting in a net margin of 14.3%.
CRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DT and CRM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRM has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to DT (10.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DT dropped -61.77% vs CRM's -70.50%.
DT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DT and CRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer