DSTL vs. TTAC
DSTL (Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF) and TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSTL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Distillate Capital, while TTAC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DSTL returned 9.04%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for TTAC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DSTL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TTAC.
Performance
DSTL vs. TTAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSTL achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than TTAC's 17.63% return.
DSTL
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- —
TTAC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 17.63%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- —
DSTL vs. TTAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | 2.53% | 8.71% | 12.78% | 22.71% | -10.64% | 28.87% | 19.31% | 35.49% | -6.66% |
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 17.63% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 22.97% | -14.60% | 30.66% | 18.30% | 26.03% | -6.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSTL and TTAC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DSTL and TTAC has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DSTL vs. TTAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSTL
TTAC
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
DSTL
TTAC
Healthcare
DSTL
TTAC
Industrials
DSTL
TTAC
Consumer Cyclical
DSTL
TTAC
Communication Services
DSTL
TTAC
Financial Services
DSTL
TTAC
Energy
DSTL
TTAC
Consumer Defensive
DSTL
TTAC
Utilities
DSTL
TTAC
-
Basic Materials
DSTL
TTAC
Real Estate
DSTL
-
TTAC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSTL vs. TTAC — Risk / Return Rank
DSTL
TTAC
DSTL vs. TTAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DSTL | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.90 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 9.41 | -4.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DSTL | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.36 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.75 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
DSTL vs. TTAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSTL drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum TTAC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSTL and TTAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSTL | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.09% | -34.95% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -7.17% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -19.92% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.10% | -21.88% | +1.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | 0.00% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -4.99% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.21% | +0.54% |
Volatility
DSTL vs. TTAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is 3.39%, while TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that DSTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSTL | TTAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 4.48% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | 11.70% | -3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.87% | 15.31% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 17.09% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 18.71% | +0.68% |
DSTL vs. TTAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSTL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TTAC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSTL vs. TTAC - Dividend Comparison
DSTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than TTAC's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.34% | 1.30% | 1.35% | 1.01% | 0.83% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 0.53% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSTL and TTAC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTAC has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to DSTL (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSTL dropped -33.09% vs TTAC's -34.95%.
On 5-year performance, TTAC leads with 12.77% vs 9.04% for DSTL. On fees, DSTL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DSTL has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TTAC has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DSTL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.
DSTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.
DSTL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TTAC is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Distillate Capital and TrimTabs. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DSTL and 0.59% for TTAC.
TTAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSTL and TTAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer