DSTL vs. PNQI
DSTL (Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF) and PNQI (Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSTL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Distillate, while PNQI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Internet Index. DSTL is actively managed, while PNQI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DSTL returned 10.39%/yr vs -0.37%/yr for PNQI. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DSTL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PNQI.
Performance
DSTL vs. PNQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSTL achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than PNQI's -9.13% return.
DSTL
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.47%
PNQI
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- 6M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- -9.13%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.23M | $3.71M | $4.59M | |
| $4.40M | $3.35M | $2.63M |
DSTL vs. PNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | 11.38% | 8.71% | 12.78% | 22.71% | -10.64% | 28.87% | 19.31% | 35.49% | -8.42% |
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | -9.13% | 15.56% | 29.44% | 60.69% | -47.92% | -5.57% | 61.36% | 28.76% | -8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSTL and PNQI is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between DSTL and PNQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
DSTL vs. PNQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSTL
PNQI
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DSTL
PNQI
Healthcare
DSTL
PNQI
Industrials
DSTL
PNQI
Consumer Cyclical
DSTL
PNQI
Financial Services
DSTL
PNQI
Communication Services
DSTL
PNQI
Energy
DSTL
PNQI
-
Consumer Defensive
DSTL
PNQI
-
Utilities
DSTL
PNQI
-
Basic Materials
DSTL
PNQI
-
Real Estate
DSTL
-
PNQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSTL vs. PNQI — Risk / Return Rank
DSTL
PNQI
DSTL vs. PNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSTL | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.96 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | -0.28 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | -0.55 | +7.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSTL vs. PNQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSTL drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum PNQI drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSTL and PNQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSTL | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.09% | -59.70% | +26.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -24.85% | +16.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -24.85% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.10% | -59.34% | +39.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | -14.12% | +11.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -13.00% | +8.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 12.67% | -9.79% |
Volatility
DSTL vs. PNQI - Volatility Comparison
Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) have volatilities of 6.39% and 6.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSTL | PNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 6.38% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 16.57% | -5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 20.14% | -6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 27.04% | -11.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 25.37% | -5.98% |
DSTL vs. PNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSTL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PNQI's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSTL vs. PNQI - Dividend Comparison
DSTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, while PNQI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.34% | 1.30% | 1.35% | 1.01% | 0.83% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PNQI Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSTL and PNQI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSTL has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to PNQI (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSTL dropped -33.09% vs PNQI's -59.70%.
On 5-year performance, DSTL leads with 10.39% vs -0.37% for PNQI. On fees, DSTL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DSTL has performed better with a 10.39% return vs -0.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DSTL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.
DSTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.00% for PNQI.
DSTL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PNQI is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Distillate and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DSTL and 0.62% for PNQI.
DSTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSTL and PNQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer