DSMC vs. GDT
DSMC (Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DSMC is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Distillate, while GDT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DSMC charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
DSMC vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DSMC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- YTD
- 20.82%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.53%
GDT
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -15.17%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $134.46K | $196.71K | $205.16K | |
| $109.12K | $93.57K | $105.33K |
DSMC vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DSMC Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF | 12.99% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -15.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSMC and GDT is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSMC vs. GDT — Risk / Return Rank
DSMC
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DSMC vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSMC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSMC vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSMC drawdown since its inception was -28.62%, which is greater than GDT's maximum drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSMC and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSMC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.62% | -24.66% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -23.64% | +22.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -13.53% | +7.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | — | — |
Volatility
DSMC vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSMC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 30.80% | -14.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 30.80% | -10.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 30.80% | -10.62% |
DSMC vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSMC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSMC vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
DSMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than GDT's 3.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSMC Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF | 1.09% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.02% | 0.27% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 3.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSMC and GDT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DSMC.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 1.09% for DSMC.
DSMC is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while GDT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Distillate and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DSMC and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for DSMC and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer