DSL vs. BILDX
DSL (DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund) and BILDX (DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund) are both mutual funds - DSL is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by DoubleLine, while BILDX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 5 years, DSL returned 1.14%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for BILDX. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DSL charges 2.28%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for BILDX.
Performance
DSL vs. BILDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSL achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than BILDX's 0.42% return.
DSL
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- -1.01%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.86%
BILDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $5.15M | $6.19M | $5.58M |
DSL vs. BILDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 1.45% | -0.01% | 15.00% | 23.41% | -22.61% | 7.39% | -6.49% | 25.10% | -6.04% | 16.39% |
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 0.42% | 7.59% | 4.41% | 8.89% | -11.54% | 0.14% | 5.48% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSL and BILDX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSL vs. BILDX — Risk / Return Rank
DSL
BILDX
DSL vs. BILDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) and DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSL | BILDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.20 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 1.58 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 4.74 | -4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSL vs. BILDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSL drawdown since its inception was -49.51%, which is greater than BILDX's maximum drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSL and BILDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSL | BILDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.51% | -15.68% | -33.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.16% | -2.21% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | -3.14% | -11.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.18% | -15.60% | -18.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.31% | -1.11% | -5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -2.96% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.99% | 0.73% | +5.26% |
Volatility
DSL vs. BILDX - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) at 0.84%. This indicates that DSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSL | BILDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 0.84% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.23% | 2.39% | +5.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.80% | 3.08% | +6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 4.43% | +10.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 4.08% | +16.01% |
DSL vs. BILDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSL has a 2.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BILDX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSL vs. BILDX - Dividend Comparison
DSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.37%, more than BILDX's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 4.56% | 4.64% | 4.11% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.45% | 2.89% | 3.40% | 3.18% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 12.37% | 11.71% | 11.38% | 10.78% | 13.67% | 10.74% | 10.69% | 9.33% | 10.39% | 9.11% | 9.53% | 11.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSL and BILDX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSL has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to BILDX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSL dropped -49.51% vs BILDX's -15.68%.
BILDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSL and BILDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer