DSL vs. PDI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI).

DSL is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 26, 2013.

Performance

DSL vs. PDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DSL vs. PDI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund	-1.06%	-0.01%	15.00%	23.41%	-22.61%	7.39%	-6.49%	25.10%	-6.04%	16.39%
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund	0.17%	11.03%	17.18%	11.99%	-16.99%	7.81%	-9.96%	22.23%	7.35%	18.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSL achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than PDI's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, DSL has underperformed PDI with an annualized return of 6.03%, while PDI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.

DSL

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -4.14%
• YTD: -1.06%
• 6M: -6.55%
• 1Y: -3.92%
• 3Y*: 10.04%
• 5Y*: 0.87%
• 10Y*: 6.03%

PDI

• 1D: 3.13%
• 1M: -3.71%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: -7.15%
• 1Y: -0.44%
• 3Y*: 13.14%
• 5Y*: 3.57%
• 10Y*: 8.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DSL vs. PDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSL

DSL Risk / Return Rank: 3
DSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
DSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DSL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DSL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

PDI

PDI Risk / Return Rank: 38
PDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PDI Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PDI Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSL vs. PDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DSL	PDI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	-0.02	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.28	0.09	-0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.02	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	-0.01	-0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.62	-0.03	-0.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DSL vs. PDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the PDI Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSL and PDI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DSL	PDI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	-0.02	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.23	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.43	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.59	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between DSL and PDI is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DSL vs. PDI - Dividend Comparison

DSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.19%, less than PDI's 15.46% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund	12.19%	11.71%	11.38%	10.78%	13.67%	10.74%	10.69%	9.33%	10.39%	9.11%	9.53%	11.63%
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund	15.46%	14.94%	14.43%	14.74%	17.84%	10.21%	10.01%	9.45%	10.78%	8.81%	14.79%	18.70%

Drawdowns

DSL vs. PDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSL drawdown since its inception was -49.51%, which is greater than PDI's maximum drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSL and PDI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSL	PDI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.51%	-46.47%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-14.34%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.18%	-27.23%	-6.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.51%	-46.47%	-3.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.63%	-7.66%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-6.22%	-2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.32%	5.03%	+0.29%

Volatility

DSL vs. PDI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) is 5.09%, while PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that DSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSL	PDI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	5.71%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.05%	9.96%	-2.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.58%	18.36%	-4.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.80%	15.66%	-0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.08%	19.06%	+1.02%