PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSI vs. SPXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSI vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF (DSI) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DSI

1D
1.97%
1M
2.00%
6M
10.56%
YTD
12.46%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
15.02%
ALL TIME*
10.75%

SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.78M$14.31M$16.21M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DSI vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DSI
iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF
12.46%11.04%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.00%9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DSI and SPXM is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSI vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DSI
DSI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DSI vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF (DSI) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSISPXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.44

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.16

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

10.12

-1.90

DSI vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSI and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSI vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and SPXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSISPXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.23%

-5.08%

-49.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-5.08%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.75%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-0.78%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

Volatility

DSI vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF (DSI) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that DSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSISPXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

0.00%

+4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

1.22%

+10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

7.38%

+7.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.14%

7.39%

+10.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

7.39%

+11.36%

DSI vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSI vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSI
iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF
0.86%0.92%1.03%1.19%1.39%0.99%1.22%1.40%1.63%1.28%1.51%1.46%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSI and SPXM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSI has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

On 1-year performance, DSI leads with 23.30% vs 8.90% for SPXM. On fees, DSI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DSI has performed better with a 23.30% return vs 8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DSI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

DSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.47% for SPXM.

DSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSI and SPXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer