PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSI vs. RPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSI vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSI achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 28.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DSI has outperformed RPG with an annualized return of 15.03%, while RPG has yielded a comparatively lower 14.21% annualized return.


DSI

1D
0.59%
1M
0.97%
6M
8.91%
YTD
10.94%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
15.03%

RPG

1D
1.70%
1M
-1.66%
6M
22.26%
YTD
28.19%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
25.41%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
14.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSI vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
10.94%18.03%22.38%28.51%-21.71%31.32%20.94%31.15%-3.90%20.89%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
28.19%13.41%28.23%8.04%-27.55%29.40%29.34%28.34%-4.53%26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DSI and RPG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.87

The correlation between DSI and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DSI vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DSI
RPG

Technology

43.1%
45.8%

Communication Services

12.8%
7.0%

Financial Services

10.1%
5.4%

Industrials

8.0%
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
12.8%

Healthcare

7.0%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
1.1%

Real Estate

2.6%
0.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.2%

Energy

1.5%
1.5%

Utilities

0.9%
2.7%

Technology

DSI
43.1%
RPG
45.8%

Communication Services

DSI
12.8%
RPG
7.0%

Financial Services

DSI
10.1%
RPG
5.4%

Industrials

DSI
8.0%
RPG
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DSI
8.0%
RPG
12.8%

Healthcare

DSI
7.0%
RPG
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

DSI
4.0%
RPG
1.1%

Real Estate

DSI
2.6%
RPG
0.9%

Basic Materials

DSI
2.2%
RPG
1.2%

Energy

DSI
1.5%
RPG
1.5%

Utilities

DSI
0.9%
RPG
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSI vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSI
DSI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

RPG
RPG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSI vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSIRPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.62

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.13

9.14

-1.00

DSI vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the RPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSI and RPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSI vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, roughly equal to the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and RPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSIRPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.23%

-53.27%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-11.08%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-24.75%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.36%

-35.59%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-36.58%

+2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-6.36%

+5.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-8.81%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.18%

-0.45%

Volatility

DSI vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) is 4.39%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that DSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSIRPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

11.39%

-7.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

20.55%

-9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

23.49%

-9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

24.15%

-6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

23.02%

-4.32%

DSI vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSI vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than RPG's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
0.87%0.92%1.03%1.19%1.39%0.99%1.22%1.40%1.63%1.28%1.51%1.46%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
0.15%0.24%0.25%1.44%0.74%0.00%0.46%0.83%0.47%0.56%0.43%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSI and RPG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPG has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to DSI (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs RPG's -53.27%.

On 10-year performance, DSI leads with 15.03% vs 14.21% for RPG. On fees, DSI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DSI has performed better with a 15.03% return vs 14.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DSI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

DSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.

DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.35% for RPG.

DSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSI and RPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer