DSI vs. RPG
DSI (iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DSI tracks the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index while RPG tracks the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DSI returned 15.48%/yr vs 15.16%/yr for RPG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DSI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.
Performance
DSI vs. RPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSI achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DSI having a 15.48% annualized return and RPG not far behind at 15.16%.
DSI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 23.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
RPG
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 30.55%
- 6M
- 27.48%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- 27.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
DSI vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSI iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF | 8.29% | 18.03% | 22.38% | 28.51% | -21.71% | 31.32% | 20.94% | 31.15% | -3.90% | 20.89% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 30.55% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 28.34% | -4.53% | 26.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSI and RPG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DSI and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
DSI vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSI
RPG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
DSI
RPG
Communication Services
DSI
RPG
Financial Services
DSI
RPG
Industrials
DSI
RPG
Consumer Cyclical
DSI
RPG
Healthcare
DSI
RPG
Consumer Defensive
DSI
RPG
Real Estate
DSI
RPG
Basic Materials
DSI
RPG
Energy
DSI
RPG
Utilities
DSI
RPG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSI vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank
DSI
RPG
DSI vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSI | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 3.30 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 12.38 | -3.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSI vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, roughly equal to the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and RPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSI | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.23% | -53.27% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -11.08% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.58% | -24.75% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.36% | -35.59% | +7.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | -36.58% | +2.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -4.43% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -8.83% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.95% | -0.26% |
Volatility
DSI vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) is 5.58%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that DSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSI | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 11.10% | -5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 18.98% | -7.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 22.06% | -8.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 23.86% | -5.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 22.89% | -4.16% |
DSI vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSI vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison
DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than RPG's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSI iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF | 0.89% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 0.99% | 1.22% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.28% | 1.51% | 1.46% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSI and RPG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to DSI (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs RPG's -53.27%.
On 10-year performance, DSI leads with 15.48% vs 15.16% for RPG. On fees, DSI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DSI has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DSI has performed better with a 15.48% return vs 15.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DSI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
DSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.
DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.35% for RPG.
DSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSI and RPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer