PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSI vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSI vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DSI having a 8.47% return and ILCB slightly higher at 8.52%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DSI having a 15.50% annualized return and ILCB not far behind at 14.97%.


DSI

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
8.47%
6M
7.30%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
15.50%

ILCB

1D
-1.36%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
8.52%
6M
7.55%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
14.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSI vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
8.47%18.03%22.38%28.51%-21.71%31.32%20.94%31.15%-3.90%20.89%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
8.52%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.51%22.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DSI and ILCB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.92

The correlation between DSI and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

DSI vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DSI
ILCB

Technology

43.1%
38.9%

Communication Services

12.8%
9.9%

Financial Services

10.1%
11.4%

Industrials

8.0%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
9.3%

Healthcare

7.0%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.5%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.7%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.8%

Energy

1.5%
3.1%

Utilities

0.9%
2.6%

Technology

DSI
43.1%
ILCB
38.9%

Communication Services

DSI
12.8%
ILCB
9.9%

Financial Services

DSI
10.1%
ILCB
11.4%

Industrials

DSI
8.0%
ILCB
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DSI
8.0%
ILCB
9.3%

Healthcare

DSI
7.0%
ILCB
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

DSI
4.0%
ILCB
4.5%

Real Estate

DSI
2.6%
ILCB
1.7%

Basic Materials

DSI
2.2%
ILCB
1.8%

Energy

DSI
1.5%
ILCB
3.1%

Utilities

DSI
0.9%
ILCB
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSI vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSI
DSI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSI vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSIILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.63

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

11.66

-2.39

DSI vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSI and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSI vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, which is greater than ILCB's maximum drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSIILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.23%

-51.53%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-9.09%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-19.05%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.36%

-25.47%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-35.30%

+1.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.50%

-3.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-6.23%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.05%

+0.63%

Volatility

DSI vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 4.82%. This indicates that DSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSIILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

4.82%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

9.99%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

12.66%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

17.23%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

18.20%

+0.53%

DSI vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DSI vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than ILCB's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
0.89%0.92%1.03%1.19%1.39%0.99%1.22%1.40%1.63%1.28%1.51%1.46%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DSI and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DSI has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to ILCB (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 10-year performance, DSI leads with 15.50% vs 14.97% for ILCB. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DSI has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DSI.

ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.89% for DSI.

DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.03% for ILCB.

ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSI and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer