PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSGR vs. APH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DSGR vs. APH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Distribution Solutions Group Inc (DSGR) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSGR achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than APH's 19.33% return. Over the past 10 years, DSGR has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 15.84%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 28.28% annualized return.


DSGR

1D
0.03%
1M
27.10%
6M
21.77%
YTD
26.21%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
15.84%
ALL TIME*
4.17%

APH

1D
0.55%
1M
-2.36%
6M
11.92%
YTD
19.33%
1Y
55.11%
3Y*
54.89%
5Y*
35.99%
10Y*
28.28%
ALL TIME*
22.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.19B$1.10B$1.42B
$10.38M$9.97M$4.59M

DSGR vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSGR
Distribution Solutions Group Inc
26.21%-20.38%9.00%71.24%-32.68%7.54%-2.28%64.87%27.68%3.99%
APH
Amphenol Corporation
19.33%96.08%41.30%31.85%-11.96%35.25%22.09%34.91%-6.82%31.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DSGR and APH is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 1991

0.25

The correlation between DSGR and APH shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DSGR:

$1.60B

APH:

$197.70B

EPS

DSGR:

$0.12

APH:

$4.00

PE Ratio

DSGR:

296.75

APH:

40.15

PS Ratio

DSGR:

0.81

APH:

7.13

PB Ratio

DSGR:

2.51

APH:

13.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

DSGR:

$2.00B

APH:

$29.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DSGR:

$638.15M

APH:

$11.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

DSGR:

$135.84M

APH:

$9.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSGR vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DSGR
DSGR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DSGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DSGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSGR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DSGR vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distribution Solutions Group Inc (DSGR) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSGRAPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

1.85

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

4.55

-3.56

DSGR vs. APH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the APH Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSGR and APH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSGR vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSGR drawdown since its inception was -86.83%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSGR and APH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSGRAPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.83%

-63.41%

-23.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.94%

-28.19%

-13.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.73%

-28.19%

-24.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.12%

-28.73%

-24.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.03%

-37.56%

-20.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.37%

-8.86%

-6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.89%

-13.54%

-17.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.56%

11.44%

+4.12%

Volatility

DSGR vs. APH - Volatility Comparison

Distribution Solutions Group Inc (DSGR) has a higher volatility of 22.63% compared to Amphenol Corporation (APH) at 13.69%. This indicates that DSGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSGRAPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.63%

13.69%

+8.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.23%

35.63%

+15.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.76%

44.23%

+13.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.04%

31.52%

+14.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.52%

28.33%

+17.19%

Dividends

DSGR vs. APH - Dividend Comparison

DSGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.57%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%
DSGR
Distribution Solutions Group Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DSGR vs. APH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Distribution Solutions Group Inc and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

DSGR vs. APH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Distribution Solutions Group Inc and Amphenol Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

DSGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Distribution Solutions Group Inc reported a gross profit of 163.34M and revenue of 496.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.

APH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.55B and revenue of 8.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

DSGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Distribution Solutions Group Inc reported an operating income of 13.63M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.

APH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 2.58B and revenue of 8.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.5%.

DSGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Distribution Solutions Group Inc reported a net income of 382.00K and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.

APH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 1.77B and revenue of 8.76B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DSGR and APH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSGR has higher volatility (22.63%) compared to APH (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSGR dropped -86.83% vs APH's -63.41%.

APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSGR and APH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer