PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DS2P.L vs. 2MSF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DS2P.L vs. 2MSF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DS2P.L achieves a -11.00% return, which is significantly higher than 2MSF.L's -41.74% return.


DS2P.L

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.79%
6M
-1.11%
YTD
-11.00%
1Y
-7.47%
3Y*
-24.32%
5Y*
-20.16%
10Y*
-23.39%

2MSF.L

1D
-3.95%
1M
0.72%
6M
-34.51%
YTD
-41.74%
1Y
-50.26%
3Y*
-5.82%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DS2P.L vs. 2MSF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DS2P.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-11.00%-29.68%-28.35%-29.73%13.75%-35.96%-31.61%-42.13%34.26%2.19%
2MSF.L
Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP
-41.74%4.50%17.75%106.56%-51.52%121.86%56.71%122.13%0.93%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DS2P.L and 2MSF.L is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2017

-0.40

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DS2P.L and 2MSF.L has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.40 to -0.17, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DS2P.L vs. 2MSF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DS2P.L
DS2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

2MSF.L
2MSF.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
2MSF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
2MSF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DS2P.L vs. 2MSF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DS2P.L2MSF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.85

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

-0.81

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

-1.35

+0.76

DS2P.L vs. 2MSF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is higher than the 2MSF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DS2P.L and 2MSF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DS2P.L vs. 2MSF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DS2P.L drawdown since its inception was -99.62%, which is greater than 2MSF.L's maximum drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DS2P.L and 2MSF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DS2P.L2MSF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.62%

-61.61%

-38.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.26%

-61.61%

+34.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.63%

-61.61%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.85%

-61.61%

-17.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.59%

-55.13%

-44.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.22%

-19.16%

-70.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.82%

37.31%

-24.49%

Volatility

DS2P.L vs. 2MSF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) is 9.45%, while Leverage Shares 2x Microsoft ETC A GBP (2MSF.L) has a volatility of 19.68%. This indicates that DS2P.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2MSF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DS2P.L2MSF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.45%

19.68%

-10.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.11%

51.89%

-23.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.11%

57.05%

-22.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.73%

51.18%

-14.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.73%

51.73%

-13.00%

DS2P.L vs. 2MSF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DS2P.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than 2MSF.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DS2P.L vs. 2MSF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DS2P.L nor 2MSF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DS2P.L and 2MSF.L have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DS2P.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DS2P.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2MSF.L.

DS2P.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR, while 2MSF.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x MSFT Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DS2P.L and 0.75% for 2MSF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DS2P.L and 2MSF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer