PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRSK vs. FALN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DRSK vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DRSK vs. FALN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
-3.09%7.67%12.50%2.08%-9.57%0.88%13.80%12.64%2.40%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
-0.49%8.92%7.68%13.47%-13.79%5.40%14.85%17.42%-5.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly lower than FALN's -0.49% return.


DRSK

1D
0.15%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-3.09%
6M
-5.22%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
5.53%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*

FALN

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.31%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DRSK vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DRSK vs. FALN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FALN
FALN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRSK vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRSKFALNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

0.98

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

1.40

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.23

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.25

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.58

5.37

-3.79

DRSK vs. FALN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the FALN Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRSK and FALN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRSKFALNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

0.98

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.51

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.72

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between DRSK and FALN is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DRSK vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than FALN's 6.51% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.88%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%0.00%0.00%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
6.51%6.31%6.24%5.37%5.08%3.40%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.98%3.55%

Drawdowns

DRSK vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and FALN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DRSKFALNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

-29.22%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-5.57%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-18.78%

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.14%

-2.28%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-3.37%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.29%

+1.37%

Volatility

DRSK vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) is 1.76%, while iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that DRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DRSKFALNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

2.82%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

3.57%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.08%

6.92%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.22%

7.28%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.00%

9.01%

-2.01%