DRSK vs. ENFR
DRSK (Aptus Defined Risk ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRSK is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. DRSK is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRSK returned 2.97%/yr vs 19.88%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRSK charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
DRSK vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 21.84% return.
DRSK
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 7.85%
- 3Y*
- 8.90%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- 21.84%
- 6M
- 24.56%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
DRSK vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 3.00% | 7.67% | 12.50% | 2.08% | -9.57% | 0.88% | 13.80% | 12.64% | 2.36% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 21.84% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -20.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRSK and ENFR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2018 | 0.21 |
The correlation between DRSK and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRSK vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
DRSK
ENFR
DRSK vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRSK | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.28 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 2.80 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 7.23 | -4.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRSK vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRSK | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.87% | -68.28% | +48.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -8.64% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.60% | -15.58% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -20.29% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -7.06% | +5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -15.94% | +11.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.34% | -0.53% |
Volatility
DRSK vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) is 2.44%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that DRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRSK | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 5.34% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.29% | 11.57% | -6.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.36% | 14.77% | -6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.43% | 19.25% | -11.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.07% | 24.67% | -17.60% |
DRSK vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRSK vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than ENFR's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 3.65% | 3.67% | 3.31% | 3.57% | 1.93% | 2.64% | 5.69% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.12% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRSK and ENFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to DRSK (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRSK dropped -19.87% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 5-year performance, ENFR leads with 19.88% vs 2.97% for DRSK. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DRSK has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 19.88% return vs 2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DRSK.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 3.65% for DRSK.
DRSK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRSK and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer