DRSK vs. AOR
DRSK (Aptus Defined Risk ETF) and AOR (iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. DRSK is actively managed, while AOR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRSK returned 3.13%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for AOR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRSK charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOR.
Performance
DRSK vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than AOR's 7.65% return.
DRSK
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
AOR
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 19.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
DRSK vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 4.10% | 7.67% | 12.50% | 2.08% | -9.57% | 0.88% | 13.80% | 12.64% | 2.40% |
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 7.65% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 11.19% | 11.42% | 18.91% | -7.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRSK and AOR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between DRSK and AOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DRSK vs. AOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRSK
AOR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DRSK
AOR
Financial Services
DRSK
AOR
Communication Services
DRSK
AOR
Consumer Cyclical
DRSK
AOR
Healthcare
DRSK
AOR
Industrials
DRSK
AOR
Consumer Defensive
DRSK
AOR
Energy
DRSK
AOR
Utilities
DRSK
AOR
Real Estate
DRSK
AOR
Basic Materials
DRSK
AOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRSK vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank
DRSK
AOR
DRSK vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRSK | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 2.89 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | 12.64 | -9.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRSK | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.28 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.67 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.69 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
DRSK vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, smaller than the maximum AOR drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and AOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRSK | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.87% | -24.44% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -6.64% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.60% | -9.77% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -21.72% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.29% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -3.47% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 1.52% | +1.27% |
Volatility
DRSK vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) at 2.66%. This indicates that DRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRSK | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 2.66% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | 6.81% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 8.42% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 10.55% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.06% | 10.67% | -3.61% |
DRSK vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRSK vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than AOR's 2.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 2.46% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 3.61% | 3.67% | 3.31% | 3.57% | 1.93% | 2.64% | 5.69% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRSK and AOR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRSK has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to AOR (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRSK dropped -19.87% vs AOR's -24.44%.
On 5-year performance, AOR leads with 7.00% vs 3.13% for DRSK. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AOR has performed better with a 7.00% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DRSK.
DRSK has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.46% for AOR.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 0.15% for AOR.
AOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRSK and AOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer