PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRSK vs. AOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRSK vs. AOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than AOR's 7.65% return.


DRSK

1D
0.34%
1M
2.76%
YTD
4.10%
6M
2.54%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*

AOR

1D
0.24%
1M
2.53%
YTD
7.65%
6M
8.14%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
8.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRSK vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
4.10%7.67%12.50%2.08%-9.57%0.88%13.80%12.64%2.40%
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
7.65%16.44%10.68%15.75%-15.64%11.19%11.42%18.91%-7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DRSK and AOR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018

0.58

The correlation between DRSK and AOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DRSK vs. AOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRSK
AOR

Technology

35.6%
27.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
16.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.5%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.0%

Industrials

8.3%
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.0%

Energy

3.5%
4.3%

Utilities

2.4%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.2%

Technology

DRSK
35.6%
AOR
27.8%

Financial Services

DRSK
11.8%
AOR
16.2%

Communication Services

DRSK
11.2%
AOR
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DRSK
10.1%
AOR
9.5%

Healthcare

DRSK
8.5%
AOR
8.0%

Industrials

DRSK
8.3%
AOR
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

DRSK
4.9%
AOR
5.0%

Energy

DRSK
3.5%
AOR
4.3%

Utilities

DRSK
2.4%
AOR
2.7%

Real Estate

DRSK
1.9%
AOR
2.4%

Basic Materials

DRSK
1.8%
AOR
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRSK vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRSK vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRSKAORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.43

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.89

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.89

12.64

-9.75

DRSK vs. AOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the AOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRSK and AOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRSKAORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

2.28

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.67

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.69

+0.12

Drawdowns

DRSK vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, smaller than the maximum AOR drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and AOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRSKAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

-24.44%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-6.64%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.60%

-9.77%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-21.72%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.29%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-3.47%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.52%

+1.27%

Volatility

DRSK vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) at 2.66%. This indicates that DRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRSKAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.66%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

6.81%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.26%

8.42%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

10.55%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.06%

10.67%

-3.61%

DRSK vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRSK vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison

DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than AOR's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
2.46%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.61%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRSK and AOR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRSK has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to AOR (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRSK dropped -19.87% vs AOR's -24.44%.

On 5-year performance, AOR leads with 7.00% vs 3.13% for DRSK. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AOR has performed better with a 7.00% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AOR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DRSK.

DRSK has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.46% for AOR.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 0.15% for AOR.

AOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRSK and AOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer