DRNZ vs. XAR
DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - DRNZ tracks the VettaFi Drone Index while XAR tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRNZ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
DRNZ vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRNZ achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 12.99% return.
DRNZ
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -12.50%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- -4.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 12.99%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 36.07%
- 3Y*
- 32.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.41%
- 10Y*
- 18.31%
DRNZ vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | -1.62% | -12.91% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 12.99% | -3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRNZ and XAR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRNZ vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
DRNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XAR
DRNZ vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRNZ | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRNZ vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRNZ drawdown since its inception was -27.02%, smaller than the maximum XAR drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNZ and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRNZ | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.02% | -46.37% | +19.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.02% | -6.88% | -20.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.14% | -6.78% | -5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.17% | — |
Volatility
DRNZ vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRNZ | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.18% | 27.98% | +23.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.18% | 23.69% | +27.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.18% | 24.74% | +26.44% |
DRNZ vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRNZ vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
DRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.30% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRNZ and XAR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRNZ.
XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for DRNZ.
DRNZ tracks VettaFi Drone Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRNZ and 0.35% for XAR.
Find the right allocation for DRNZ and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer