PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIV vs. SPGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIV vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIV achieves a 27.45% return, which is significantly higher than SPGM's 13.01% return.


DRIV

1D
2.42%
1M
-2.37%
6M
22.42%
YTD
27.45%
1Y
57.41%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*

SPGM

1D
1.08%
1M
2.71%
6M
11.14%
YTD
13.01%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIV vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
27.45%30.42%-5.04%26.14%-34.13%27.80%62.76%28.54%-21.03%
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
13.01%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-10.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIV and SPGM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2018

0.87

The correlation between DRIV and SPGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DRIV vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRIV
SPGM

Technology

37.3%
30.7%

Consumer Cyclical

25.3%
9.0%

Industrials

18.0%
12.5%

Basic Materials

13.7%
3.8%

Communication Services

5.7%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

4.0%

Financial Services

-

15.7%

Healthcare

-

7.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Technology

DRIV
37.3%
SPGM
30.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DRIV
25.3%
SPGM
9.0%

Industrials

DRIV
18.0%
SPGM
12.5%

Basic Materials

DRIV
13.7%
SPGM
3.8%

Communication Services

DRIV
5.7%
SPGM
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

DRIV

-

SPGM
4.5%

Energy

DRIV

-

SPGM
4.0%

Financial Services

DRIV

-

SPGM
15.7%

Healthcare

DRIV

-

SPGM
7.9%

Real Estate

DRIV

-

SPGM
1.8%

Utilities

DRIV

-

SPGM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIV vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIV vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRIVSPGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

2.71

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

11.72

+0.60

DRIV vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIV and SPGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIV vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and SPGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIVSPGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.93%

-33.97%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.44%

-9.50%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.18%

-16.90%

-17.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.93%

-25.93%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.34%

-0.75%

-10.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-4.79%

-10.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

2.19%

+2.48%

Volatility

DRIV vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) at 5.68%. This indicates that DRIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIVSPGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.74%

5.68%

+8.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.31%

11.52%

+11.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.10%

13.76%

+14.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.69%

16.17%

+11.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.66%

17.45%

+10.21%

DRIV vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIV has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRIV vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than SPGM's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
0.58%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.79%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIV and SPGM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIV has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to SPGM (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIV dropped -41.93% vs SPGM's -33.97%.

On 5-year performance, SPGM leads with 11.43% vs 7.58% for DRIV. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.

SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.58% for DRIV.

DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while SPGM tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DRIV and 0.09% for SPGM.

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIV and SPGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer