DRIV vs. PID
DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds - DRIV tracks the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index while PID tracks the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRIV returned 9.49%/yr vs 8.28%/yr for PID. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRIV charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
DRIV vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRIV achieves a 42.27% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 5.45% return.
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 42.27%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 92.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
PID
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
DRIV vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 42.27% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 28.54% | -21.49% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 5.45% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 14.28% | -6.48% | 24.49% | -6.56% | 25.87% | -9.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRIV and PID is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between DRIV and PID shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DRIV vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRIV
PID
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DRIV
PID
Consumer Cyclical
DRIV
PID
Industrials
DRIV
PID
Basic Materials
DRIV
PID
Communication Services
DRIV
PID
Consumer Defensive
DRIV
-
PID
Energy
DRIV
-
PID
Financial Services
DRIV
-
PID
Healthcare
DRIV
-
PID
Real Estate
DRIV
-
PID
Utilities
DRIV
-
PID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRIV vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
DRIV
PID
DRIV vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRIV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.30 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.92 | 2.16 | +4.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.10 | 7.36 | +16.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRIV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | 1.66 | +2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.60 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.27 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
DRIV vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and PID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRIV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.93% | -66.34% | +24.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.43% | -7.47% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.18% | -13.34% | -20.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.93% | -22.97% | -18.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -2.19% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.13% | -13.04% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 2.18% | +1.67% |
Volatility
DRIV vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.75%. This indicates that DRIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRIV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 2.75% | +6.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.29% | 7.62% | +11.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.14% | 9.70% | +15.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 13.97% | +13.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 17.84% | +9.56% |
DRIV vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRIV has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRIV vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than PID's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.75% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRIV and PID have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIV dropped -41.93% vs PID's -66.34%.
On 5-year performance, DRIV leads with 9.49% vs 8.28% for PID. On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.
PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.75% for DRIV.
DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DRIV and 0.56% for PID.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRIV and PID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer