PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIV vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIV vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIV achieves a 42.27% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 28.91% return.


DRIV

1D
-1.04%
1M
12.34%
YTD
42.27%
6M
41.87%
1Y
92.43%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*

GRID

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.85%
YTD
28.91%
6M
29.60%
1Y
51.55%
3Y*
26.27%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
19.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIV vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
42.27%30.42%-5.04%26.14%-34.13%27.80%62.76%28.54%-21.49%
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
28.91%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-21.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIV and GRID is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018

0.84

The correlation between DRIV and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

DRIV vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRIV
GRID

Technology

34.0%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

26.8%
3.5%

Industrials

19.4%
65.2%

Basic Materials

14.4%
0.0%

Communication Services

5.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

20.4%

Technology

DRIV
34.0%
GRID
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DRIV
26.8%
GRID
3.5%

Industrials

DRIV
19.4%
GRID
65.2%

Basic Materials

DRIV
14.4%
GRID
0.0%

Communication Services

DRIV
5.4%
GRID

-

Consumer Defensive

DRIV

-

GRID

-

Energy

DRIV

-

GRID

-

Financial Services

DRIV

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

DRIV

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

DRIV

-

GRID

-

Utilities

DRIV

-

GRID
20.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIV vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIV vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRIVGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.45

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.92

4.42

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.10

16.72

+7.38

DRIV vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIV Sharpe Ratio is 3.70, which is higher than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIV and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRIVGRIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70

2.67

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.85

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Drawdowns

DRIV vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, roughly equal to the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIVGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.93%

-40.56%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-11.73%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.18%

-20.77%

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.93%

-29.64%

-12.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.33%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-8.43%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

3.09%

+0.76%

Volatility

DRIV vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) at 7.95%. This indicates that DRIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIVGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

7.95%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.29%

16.08%

+3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.14%

19.39%

+5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.07%

21.00%

+6.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.40%

22.81%

+4.59%

DRIV vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIV has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRIV vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than GRID's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
0.75%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
0.77%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIV and GRID have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to GRID (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIV dropped -41.93% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 17.84% vs 9.49% for DRIV. On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.75% for DRIV.

DRIV is categorized as Global Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while GRID tracks NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DRIV and 0.70% for GRID.

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIV and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer